# This is a spam mail

**URL:** <https://rubytalk.org/t/this-is-a-spam-mail/2559>\
**Category:** ruby-talk\
**Created:** [30 October 2002 06:44 UTC](https://rubytalk.org/t/this-is-a-spam-mail/2559 "2002-10-30T06:44:54Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 9\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Shugo\_Maeda4](https://yyz1.discourse-cdn.com/flex029/user_avatar/rubytalk.org/shugo_maeda4/32/1891_2.png) [@Shugo\_Maeda4](https://rubytalk.org/u/Shugo_Maeda4)\
**Post date:** [30 October 2002 06:44 UTC](https://rubytalk.org/t/this-is-a-spam-mail/2559/1 "2002-10-30T06:44:54Z")

</div>

This is a test mail for the spam filter of ruby-talk ML.  
Sorry if you receive this mail.

I hope that the ML manager reject this mail…

Free money!  
Free money!  
Free money!  
Free money!  
Free money!  
Free money!  
Free money!  
Free money!  
Free money!  
Free money!  
Free money!  
Free money!  
Free money!  
Free money!  
Free money!  
Free money!

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Gavin\_Sinclair](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/g/db5fbb/32.png) [@Gavin\_Sinclair](https://rubytalk.org/u/Gavin_Sinclair)\
**Post date:** [30 October 2002 06:50 UTC](https://rubytalk.org/t/this-is-a-spam-mail/2559/2 "2002-10-30T06:50:03Z")

</div>

Where do I sign? 🙂

Gavin

PS. Seriously, send as much as you like. It’s nowhere near as annoying as the  
real thing.

> **···**
>
> ----- Original Message -----  
> From: “Shugo Maeda” [shugo@ruby-lang.org](mailto:shugo@ruby-lang.org)  
> To: “ruby-talk ML” [ruby-talk@ruby-lang.org](mailto:ruby-talk@ruby-lang.org)  
> Sent: Wednesday, October 30, 2002 5:44 PM  
> Subject: THIS IS A SPAM MAIL
> 
> > This is a test mail for the spam filter of ruby-talk ML.  
> > Sorry if you receive this mail.
> > 
> > I hope that the ML manager reject this mail…
> > 
> > Free money!  
> > Free money!  
> > Free money!  
> > Free money!  
> > Free money!  
> > Free money!  
> > Free money!  
> > Free money!  
> > Free money!  
> > Free money!  
> > Free money!  
> > Free money!  
> > Free money!  
> > Free money!  
> > Free money!  
> > Free money!

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Shugo\_Maeda4](https://yyz1.discourse-cdn.com/flex029/user_avatar/rubytalk.org/shugo_maeda4/32/1891_2.png) [@Shugo\_Maeda4](https://rubytalk.org/u/Shugo_Maeda4)\
**Post date:** [30 October 2002 06:51 UTC](https://rubytalk.org/t/this-is-a-spam-mail/2559/3 "2002-10-30T06:51:29Z")

</div>

Hi,

> **···**
>
> At Wed, 30 Oct 2002 15:44:54 +0900, Shugo Maeda [shugo@ruby-lang.org](mailto:shugo@ruby-lang.org) wrote:
> 
> > This is a test mail for the spam filter of ruby-talk ML.  
> > Sorry if you receive this mail.
> > 
> > I hope that the ML manager reject this mail…
> 
> Sorry, this mail was not reject:-(  
> But the test after this mail was successfully done:-)  
> Thank you.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![BPDG\_J\_Britt](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/ecc23a/32.png) [@BPDG\_J\_Britt](https://rubytalk.org/u/BPDG_J_Britt)\
**Post date:** [30 October 2002 06:53 UTC](https://rubytalk.org/t/this-is-a-spam-mail/2559/4 "2002-10-30T06:53:03Z")

</div>

> From: Shugo Maeda [[mailto:shugo@ruby-lang.org](mailto:shugo@ruby-lang.org)]  
> Sent: Tuesday, October 29, 2002 11:45 PM  
> To: ruby-talk ML  
> Subject: THIS IS A SPAM MAIL
> 
> This is a test mail for the spam filter of ruby-talk ML.  
> Sorry if you receive this mail.
> 
> I hope that the ML manager reject this mail…

If not, we will have to take you up on your offer …

> **···**
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> 
> > Free money!  
> > Free money!  
> > Free money!

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Milan\_Maksimovic](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/e99b99/32.png) [@Milan\_Maksimovic](https://rubytalk.org/u/Milan_Maksimovic)\
**Post date:** [30 October 2002 07:29 UTC](https://rubytalk.org/t/this-is-a-spam-mail/2559/5 "2002-10-30T07:29:56Z")

</div>

I’d suggest having a look at [http://www.paulgraham.com](http://www.paulgraham.com)  
A lot of interesting thoughts and good spam fighting heuristics can be found  
there. It might give you some more ideas.

Regards,  
M.

> **···**
>
> ----- Original Message -----  
> From: “Shugo Maeda” [shugo@ruby-lang.org](mailto:shugo@ruby-lang.org)  
> To: “ruby-talk ML” [ruby-talk@ruby-lang.org](mailto:ruby-talk@ruby-lang.org)  
> Sent: Wednesday, October 30, 2002 7:44 AM  
> Subject: THIS IS A SPAM MAIL
> 
> > This is a test mail for the spam filter of ruby-talk ML.  
> > Sorry if you receive this mail.
> > 
> > I hope that the ML manager reject this mail…
> > 
> > Free money!  
> > Free money!  
> > Free money!  
> > …

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![MikkelFJ1](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/ce7236/32.png) [@MikkelFJ1](https://rubytalk.org/u/MikkelFJ1)\
**Post date:** [22 November 2002 23:39 UTC](https://rubytalk.org/t/this-is-a-spam-mail/2559/6 "2002-11-22T23:39:18Z")

</div>

“Shugo Maeda” [shugo@ruby-lang.org](mailto:shugo@ruby-lang.org) wrote in message  
news:878z0gig9v.wl@studly.priv.netlab.jp…

> This is a test mail for the spam filter of ruby-talk ML.  
> Sorry if you receive this mail.
> 
> I hope that the ML manager reject this mail…

FYI:

[http://www.paulgraham.com/spam.html](http://www.paulgraham.com/spam.html)

> **[Xavier Leroy - Software](https://xavierleroy.org/software.html)**
>
> Home page of Xavier Leroy, a computer scientist. Information on Xavier Leroy's research projects, courses, publications, and open-source software.

This suggests a voting mechanism - heh then we can also vote out posters we  
don’t like 😉

Mikkel

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Shugo\_Maeda4](https://yyz1.discourse-cdn.com/flex029/user_avatar/rubytalk.org/shugo_maeda4/32/1891_2.png) [@Shugo\_Maeda4](https://rubytalk.org/u/Shugo_Maeda4)\
**Post date:** [30 October 2002 07:07 UTC](https://rubytalk.org/t/this-is-a-spam-mail/2559/7 "2002-10-30T07:07:10Z")

</div>

Hi,

> Where do I sign? 🙂

Thank you:-)

> **···**
>
> At Wed, 30 Oct 2002 15:50:03 +0900, Gavin Sinclair [gsinclair@soyabean.com.au](mailto:gsinclair@soyabean.com.au) wrote:
> 
> > ----- Original Message -----  
> > From: “Shugo Maeda” [shugo@ruby-lang.org](mailto:shugo@ruby-lang.org)  
> > To: “ruby-talk ML” [ruby-talk@ruby-lang.org](mailto:ruby-talk@ruby-lang.org)  
> > Sent: Wednesday, October 30, 2002 5:44 PM  
> > Subject: THIS IS A SPAM MAIL
> 
> This mail was not treated as a spam by the spam  
> filter (spamassassin).
> 
> # Please see the X-Spam-Status header field.
> 
> It seems that I have no sense to write a spam;-p
> 
> Shugo

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![James6](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/j/c89c15/32.png) [@James6](https://rubytalk.org/u/James6)\
**Post date:** [30 October 2002 08:48 UTC](https://rubytalk.org/t/this-is-a-spam-mail/2559/8 "2002-10-30T08:48:00Z")

</div>

> I’d suggest having a look at [http://www.paulgraham.com](http://www.paulgraham.com)  
> A lot of interesting thoughts and good spam fighting heuristics can be found  
> there. It might give you some more ideas.

I had been under the impression that only subscribers could post directly to the  
mailing list, and that the spam was spilling over form the newsgroup.

It seems I was wrong on both counts; I don’t see the same spam messages on  
c.l.r, and there are no restrictions on who can post to the list.

Would such restrictions be a good idea?

James

> **···**
>
> > Regards,  
> > M.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Gavin\_Sinclair](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/g/db5fbb/32.png) [@Gavin\_Sinclair](https://rubytalk.org/u/Gavin_Sinclair)\
**Post date:** [30 October 2002 12:20 UTC](https://rubytalk.org/t/this-is-a-spam-mail/2559/9 "2002-10-30T12:20:08Z")

</div>

> > I’d suggest having a look at [http://www.paulgraham.com](http://www.paulgraham.com)  
> > A lot of interesting thoughts and good spam fighting heuristics can be  
> > found  
> > there. It might give you some more ideas.
> 
> I had been under the impression that only subscribers could post directly to  
> the  
> mailing list, and that the spam was spilling over form the newsgroup.
> 
> It seems I was wrong on both counts; I don’t see the same spam messages on  
> c.l.r, and there are no restrictions on who can post to the list.

Now there’s a first for a mailing list!

> Would such restrictions be a good idea?

Definitely. There’s absolutely nothing to lose. People who post to the list  
wouldn’t receive it anyway if they’re not a member - unless they send from a  
different account, which is unlikely. And there’s always the newsgroup.

> James

Gavin

> **···**
>
> From: " JamesBritt" [james@jamesbritt.com](mailto:james@jamesbritt.com)
