I'm using an hash object and i use a Termine Object for the key and, for
now, a String for the value.
The class Termine is this:
class Termine
DEFAULT_LANG = "it"
attr_accessor :descrizione
attr_accessor :lingua
def initialize(descrizione="", lingua=DEFAULT_LANG) @descrizione = descrizione @lingua = lingua
end
end
In my test file all is good (compare, edit, delete and reference), but
if I dump all in a file YAML and then I load the file YAML the equal
assertion have a failure.
The attributes 'descrizione' and 'lingua' on the key are the same, but
the problem is that the id of the object is changed... and so there is
the failure.
test_yaml: before hash dump
#<Termine:0x2ada6a8>:Key T4 in lingua it -- Value: Definizione uno
#<Termine:0x2ada720>:Key T3 in lingua it -- Value: Definizione tre
#<Termine:0x2ada750>:Key T2 in lingua it -- Value: Definizione due
#<Termine:0x2ada780>:Key T1 in lingua it -- Value: Definizione uno
test_yaml: after dump (is clear)
test_yaml: after load
#<Termine:0x2ad6400>:Key T4 in lingua it -- Value: Definizione uno
#<Termine:0x2ad5f20>:Key T3 in lingua it -- Value: Definizione tre
#<Termine:0x2ad5a40>:Key T2 in lingua it -- Value: Definizione due
#<Termine:0x2ad5518>:Key T1 in lingua it -- Value: Definizione uno
You need to overload the == operator and the hash method.
class Termine
alias eql? ==
def ==(other)
descrizione == other.descrizione and lingua == other. lingua
end
def hash
(descrizione + lingua).hash
end
end
t = Termine.new("Hi")
t2 = Termine.new("Hi")
t == t2 #=> true
h = {}
h[t] = "short hello"
h #=> {#<Termine:0x24a22c @lingua="it", @descrizione="Hi">=>"short hello"}
h.has_key?(t2) #=> true
···
On Dec 19, 2005, at 9:10 AM, Andrea wrote:
I'm using an hash object and i use a Termine Object for the key and, for
now, a String for the value.
The class Termine is this:
class Termine
DEFAULT_LANG = "it"
attr_accessor :descrizione
attr_accessor :lingua
def initialize(descrizione="", lingua=DEFAULT_LANG) @descrizione = descrizione @lingua = lingua
end
end
In my test file all is good (compare, edit, delete and reference), but
if I dump all in a file YAML and then I load the file YAML the equal
assertion have a failure.
The attributes 'descrizione' and 'lingua' on the key are the same, but
the problem is that the id of the object is changed... and so there is
the failure.
test_yaml: before hash dump
#<Termine:0x2ada6a8>:Key T4 in lingua it -- Value: Definizione uno
#<Termine:0x2ada720>:Key T3 in lingua it -- Value: Definizione tre
#<Termine:0x2ada750>:Key T2 in lingua it -- Value: Definizione due
#<Termine:0x2ada780>:Key T1 in lingua it -- Value: Definizione uno
test_yaml: after dump (is clear)
test_yaml: after load
#<Termine:0x2ad6400>:Key T4 in lingua it -- Value: Definizione uno
#<Termine:0x2ad5f20>:Key T3 in lingua it -- Value: Definizione tre
#<Termine:0x2ad5a40>:Key T2 in lingua it -- Value: Definizione due
#<Termine:0x2ad5518>:Key T1 in lingua it -- Value: Definizione uno
#<Termine:0x2ad5f20>:Key T3 in lingua it -- Value: Definizione tre
You need to overload the == operator and the hash method.
class Termine
alias eql? ==
def ==(other)
descrizione == other.descrizione and lingua == other. lingua
end
def hash
(descrizione + lingua).hash
end
end
t = Termine.new("Hi")
t2 = Termine.new("Hi")
t == t2 #=> true
h = {}
h[t] = "short hello"
h #=> {#<Termine:0x24a22c @lingua="it", @descrizione="Hi">=>"short
hello"}
h.has_key?(t2) #=> true
Thank for your help... this is that I need...
--Andrea
I was playing around with this, and now I'm doubly worried I have a bug, or have missed something else. The last line in your code gives out 'false' for me. I was experimenting with this:
class Dclz @str = "A string"
attr_reader :str
def ==(o)
self.str == o.str
end
def ===(o)
self.str === o.str
end
def hash
self.str.hash
end
end
case Dclz.new
when Dclz.new
puts "Works"
else
puts "doesn't"
end # => "Works"
And I cannot understand what's happening here. Someone, please confirm that I'm either sane or stupid?
(Tried on both ruby 1.8.3 (2005-09-21) [i386-linux] and ruby 1.9.0 (2005-12-16) [i686-linux])
···
On Mon, 19 Dec 2005 15:21:22 -0000, Logan Capaldo <logancapaldo@gmail.com> wrote:
On Dec 19, 2005, at 9:10 AM, Andrea wrote:
I'm using an hash object and i use a Termine Object for the key and, for
now, a String for the value.
You need to overload the == operator and the hash method.
class Termine
alias eql? ==
def ==(other)
descrizione == other.descrizione and lingua == other. lingua
end
def hash
(descrizione + lingua).hash
end
end
t = Termine.new("Hi")
t2 = Termine.new("Hi")
t == t2 #=> true
h = {}
h[t] = "short hello"
h #=> {#<Termine:0x24a22c @lingua="it", @descrizione="Hi">=>"short hello"}
h.has_key?(t2) #=> true
As ts already mentioned, you missed the eql? part. Me aliasing it to == and implementing == instead is a function of my C++ (as opposed to lisp or smalltalk(?) ) upbringing.
···
On Dec 19, 2005, at 10:47 AM, Ross Bamford wrote:
On Mon, 19 Dec 2005 15:21:22 -0000, Logan Capaldo > <logancapaldo@gmail.com> wrote:
On Dec 19, 2005, at 9:10 AM, Andrea wrote:
I'm using an hash object and i use a Termine Object for the key and, for
now, a String for the value.
You need to overload the == operator and the hash method.
class Termine
alias eql? ==
def ==(other)
descrizione == other.descrizione and lingua == other. lingua
end
def hash
(descrizione + lingua).hash
end
end
t = Termine.new("Hi")
t2 = Termine.new("Hi")
t == t2 #=> true
h = {}
h[t] = "short hello"
h #=> {#<Termine:0x24a22c @lingua="it", @descrizione="Hi">=>"short hello"}
h.has_key?(t2) #=> true
I was playing around with this, and now I'm doubly worried I have a bug, or have missed something else. The last line in your code gives out 'false' for me. I was experimenting with this:
class Dclz @str = "A string"
attr_reader :str
def ==(o)
self.str == o.str
end
def ===(o)
self.str === o.str
end
def hash
self.str.hash
end
end
case Dclz.new
when Dclz.new
puts "Works"
else
puts "doesn't"
end # => "Works"
Yes, I see. If I move your alias to after the definition, or just implement eql?, it works. I assumed you were saving a reference to the original == as 'eql?' (missed that it already existed), which is why I got 'false' first time around. It was just that having my suspicion apparently confirmed kind of made me worried
Cheers
···
On Mon, 19 Dec 2005 16:04:56 -0000, Logan Capaldo <logancapaldo@gmail.com> wrote:
As ts already mentioned, you missed the eql? part. Me aliasing it to == and implementing == instead is a function of my C++ (as opposed to lisp or smalltalk(?) ) upbringing.
Thanks kindly.