Are there any plans to support real threads (where available) as well as
ruby simulated threads?
I am using processes in places I would naturally use LWT’s at the moment.
Andrew Walrond
You’ll probably have to wait for Rite (Ruby’s new implementation).
It’s still vapourware and moving slowly, though. See [ruby-talk:70846].
···
On Fri, May 09, 2003 at 06:36:54PM +0900, Andrew Walrond wrote:
Are there any plans to support real threads (where available) as well as
ruby simulated threads?
–
_ _
__ __ | | ___ _ __ ___ __ _ _ __
'_ \ /| __/ __| '__ \ / ` | ’ \
) | (| | |__ \ | | | | | (| | | | |
.__/ _,|_|/| || ||_,|| |_|
Running Debian GNU/Linux Sid (unstable)
batsman dot geo at yahoo dot com
Because I don’t need to worry about finances I can ignore Microsoft
and take over the (computing) world from the grassroots.
– Linus Torvalds
At least it’s on the cards. Thanks!
Mauricio Fernández wrote:
···
On Fri, May 09, 2003 at 06:36:54PM +0900, Andrew Walrond wrote:
Are there any plans to support real threads (where available) as well as
ruby simulated threads?You’ll probably have to wait for Rite (Ruby’s new implementation).
It’s still vapourware and moving slowly, though. See [ruby-talk:70846].