matz wrote:
But still, there’s no known effective way to define and check
“interface” in a language so dynamic as Ruby. Long way to go.
i disagree. you just require the proper reflection.
-t0
matz wrote:
But still, there’s no known effective way to define and check
“interface” in a language so dynamic as Ruby. Long way to go.
i disagree. you just require the proper reflection.
-t0
Hi,
In message “Re: “stereotyping” (was: Re: Strong Typing (Re: Managing metadata about attribute types)” on 03/11/20, “T. Onoma” transami@runbox.com writes:
But still, there’s no known effective way to define and check
“interface” in a language so dynamic as Ruby. Long way to go.i disagree. you just require the proper reflection.
I didn’t really get you. Could you explain what “the proper
reflection” is?
matz.