My attempt - surprisingly short. Really annoying to test because every
time you have a typo on a method name it offers to dynamically create
the method for you!
I imagine it's nothing too far removed from how everybody else is doing
it.
module QAPrototype
@@methods = Hash.new
def method_missing( name, *args )
puts "Undefined method " + self.class.to_s + "." +
name.to_s
puts "How do you want me to handle this method? (end
with a newline)"
$stdout.flush
method = Array.new
begin
line = gets
method << line
end until line.eql?("\n")
@@methods[name]=method
self.class.instance_eval do
define_method(name) { eval(method.join) }
end
puts "OK"
end
def print_defined_methods
@@methods.each_pair { |key, value|
puts key.to_s + ":"
puts value
}
end
End
I found an interesting thing when trying this in the runtime in SciTE -
for some reason when 'gets' reads in a line, if you made a mistake
whilst typing and backspaced to delete some text and re-write it, then
the string that 'gets' returns includes the deleted text. Anyone know
why this might be?
Stephen
···
************************************************************************
DISCLAIMER
The information contained in this e-mail is confidential and is intended
for the recipient only.
If you have received it in error, please notify us immediately by reply
e-mail and then delete it from your system. Please do not copy it or
use it for any other purposes, or disclose the content of the e-mail
to any other person or store or copy the information in any medium.
The views contained in this e-mail are those of the author and not
necessarily those of Admenta UK Group.
************************************************************************