It is now RCR 305. I made changing each an optional part of
the RCR. Give me some support on this, please.
···
--- Michel Martens <blaumag@gmail.com> wrote:
On 5/12/05, Eric Mahurin <eric_mahurin@yahoo.com> wrote:
> Of all of the method loops above, it only looks like the
return
> value of "each" is used. And then only 3 times (out of
1091).
> 0.3% doesn't sound that useful. I still haven't found an
> instance of any of the other method loops above where the
> return value is used. Would anybody support an RCR with
all
> but each changed to return nil?I would. The method each can also be changed.
Michel.
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail - Helps protect you from nasty viruses.
http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail