Self-calling method

I'm making a program to rename files based on the date/time they were
taken. My camera can take 5 fps, so I want to be able to handle
pictures taken at the same time (since the exif data isn't exact to less
than a second)

this is what I have so far:

---------code---------------

require('rubygems')
require('mini_exiftool')
require('LIB.BBI.rb')

def toBase36(num)
  letter='A'
  if num<10
    num36 = num.to_s
  else
    while num>10
      letter = letter.succ
      num = num-1
    end
    num36=letter
  end
  return num36
end

def timecode(image)
  if MiniExiftool.new(image)['SerialNumber'] == 620315997
    owner="JD"
  end
  time = MiniExiftool.new(image)['DateTimeOriginal']
  return to_mcode(time) +'_'+ toBase36(time.strftime('%d').to_i) +
toBase36(time.strftime('%H').to_i) +
    time.strftime('%M%S')
end

def check(string)
  if FileTest.exist?(string)
    strArr = string.split('.')
    newString = strArr.first.succ+'.'+strArr.last
    check(newString)
  else
    finalString = string
  end
  return finalString
end

def renameFilesBTC(files)
  files.each do |file|
    ext = '.'+file.split('.').last
    if file == timecode(file)+ext
      puts file+' Already Renamed'
      newName = file
    elsif file != timecode(file)+ext &&
FileTest.exist?(timecode(file)+ext)
      puts "Mulitple Files Same Time"
      newName = check(timecode(file)+'1'+ext)
    else
      puts "Rename"
      newName = timecode(file)+ext
    end
    File.rename(file , newName)
  end
end

···

------------------------------------------------------------------

I'm testing with 3 pictures taken at the same time (actually, 3 copies
of one picture).
The first two rename fine, but the third raises

------------------------------------
TypeError: cannot convert nil into String
        from ./renameByDateTime.rb:54:in `rename'
        from ./renameByDateTime.rb:54:in `renameFilesBTC'
        from ./renameByDateTime.rb:42:in `each'
        from ./renameByDateTime.rb:42:in `renameFilesBTC'
        from (irb):3
---------------------------------------

For some reason, check() returns nil for the third image, and I can't
see why it would do that.
--
Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.

Replace "check(newString)" by "finalString = check(newString)"
(line 33). Or get rid of "return finalString" (line 37).

What's the advantage of toBase36, compared to the built-in
to_s(36)?

p toBase36(30)
p 30.to_s(36)

gegroet,
Erik V. - http://www.erikveen.dds.nl/

whaaaa, changing the base of a string? this is totally bizarre to me.

003:0> p 10.to_s
"10"
nil
004:0> p 10.to_s(14)
"a"
nil

....

···

On 9/7/07, Erik Veenstra <erikveen@gmail.com> wrote:

Replace "check(newString)" by "finalString = check(newString)"
(line 33). Or get rid of "return finalString" (line 37).

What's the advantage of toBase36, compared to the built-in
to_s(36)?

p toBase36(30)
p 30.to_s(36)

gegroet,
Erik V. - http://www.erikveen.dds.nl/

Erik Veenstra wrote:

Replace "check(newString)" by "finalString = check(newString)"
(line 33). Or get rid of "return finalString" (line 37).

What's the advantage of toBase36, compared to the built-in
to_s(36)?

p toBase36(30)
p 30.to_s(36)

gegroet,
Erik V. - http://www.erikveen.dds.nl/

I simply didn't know about to_s(36)
  (I didn't see that in the Pickaxe)

It works! This is great, thanks.

···

--
Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/\.

Er, you're not changing the base of a string. (That would be something
like 10.to_s.to_base(14).) You're changing the number to be
represented as a string in a specific base, via an argument to the
to_s method.

···

On Sep 7, 8:51 am, "Simon Schuster" <significa...@gmail.com> wrote:

On 9/7/07, Erik Veenstra <erikv...@gmail.com> wrote:
> What's the advantage of toBase36, compared to the built-in
> to_s(36)?

> p toBase36(30)
> p 30.to_s(36)
whaaaa, changing the base of a string? this is totally bizarre to me.

003:0> p 10.to_s
"10"
nil
004:0> p 10.to_s(14)
"a"
nil

ok ok. I'm glad I read that wrong, it caused me some confusion.

···

On 9/7/07, Phrogz <phrogz@mac.com> wrote:

On Sep 7, 8:51 am, "Simon Schuster" <significa...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 9/7/07, Erik Veenstra <erikv...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > What's the advantage of toBase36, compared to the built-in
> > to_s(36)?
>
> > p toBase36(30)
> > p 30.to_s(36)
> whaaaa, changing the base of a string? this is totally bizarre to me.
>
> 003:0> p 10.to_s
> "10"
> nil
> 004:0> p 10.to_s(14)
> "a"
> nil

Er, you're not changing the base of a string. (That would be something
like 10.to_s.to_base(14).) You're changing the number to be
represented as a string in a specific base, via an argument to the
to_s method.