Logan Capaldo wrote:
Ok I realize the ruby community has this penchant for clever names,
but why not call it runcomments or similar?
That's a fair point. Although you might be interested in this:
Yet, in this case, becasue of it's specific application, it might
nonethless be a god idea to use a descriptive name. Tell you what...
what I really wish I could do is add an option (-h perhaps) to 'ruby'
itself. That would be the bomb.
Well, I'll think on it some more.
Thanks,
T.
