Is Ruby regression tested?
Running ‘make test’ with the source distribution doesn’t seem to do as much as
I thought (I’m used to Python’s ‘make test’ which does pretty exhaustive
testing on all modules and the interpreter).
possibly you’re looking for rubicon, this page may help:
for what I can remember, actually it is still incomplete , and there
are changes in 1.8 that causes some new assertion failure.
···
il Thu, 11 Sep 2003 10:24:24 +0900, Jeremy Dillworth j_k_wd@bellsouth.net ha scritto::
Is Ruby regression tested?
Running ‘make test’ with the source distribution doesn’t seem to do as much as
I thought (I’m used to Python’s ‘make test’ which does pretty exhaustive
testing on all modules and the interpreter).
Perfect. Thanks!
I haven’t had any problems with Ruby, and don’t expect any, but there are a
few important apps I’ll worry less about knowing that extensive testing is
being done…
···
On Wednesday 10 September 2003 10:11 pm, gabriele renzi wrote:
il Thu, 11 Sep 2003 10:24:24 +0900, Jeremy Dillworth > > j_k_wd@bellsouth.net ha scritto::
Is Ruby regression tested?
Running ‘make test’ with the source distribution doesn’t seem to do as
much as I thought (I’m used to Python’s ‘make test’ which does pretty
exhaustive testing on all modules and the interpreter).possibly you’re looking for rubicon, this page may help:
http://www.rubygarden.org/triple-r/for what I can remember, actually it is still incomplete , and there
are changes in 1.8 that causes some new assertion failure.