Notice…pure Ruby…no C…dynamically loading and calling .dlls.
Cool eh?
drool
And it is part of Ruby 1.7.2 (in CVS).
drool again.
However, how does it compare to classic bindings with regard to
performance?
Massimiliano
On Wed, Aug 28, 2002 at 10:32:57AM +0900, Rich Kilmer wrote:
Giuseppe, that’s the idea. I’m writing bash scripts for testing
convenience only.
The goal now is to let the new rpkg acquire a defined form, so I’m
taking many shortcuts. Then, time for code sweeping and cleaning will
come, which includes replacing all Unixisms with pure ruby code.
Provided Windows users agree to do some testing and bugfixing
themselves, that is, as I’m not installing it anytime soon. ;->
So, again, don’t worry. Your wishes are already on my todo list.
Massimiliano
On Wed, Aug 28, 2002 at 08:23:56PM +0900, Giuseppe Bilotta wrote:
Sources will be downloaded as well as maker scripts. Maker scripts
will be executed, things will be compiled if they need be, and one or
more distribution policy compliant packages (.rpk) will be built.
Compiled .rpk’s can then be redistributed. A maker script can be in
any language and for me rarely has gone beyond a dozen lines of bash
script.
Can we please give a hand to us Windows (l)users and use as much as
possible Ruby itself as a maker script?
You can just install it in another directory and then go to that
directory to start Ruby or just replace your 1.6.7 installation…up to
you.
I have been running 1.7.x for six months on Win32 and Linux. Bugs pop
up now and then, but nothing major (from my perspective).
-rich
-----Original Message-----
From: Tom Sawyer [mailto:transami@transami.net]
Sent: Tuesday, August 27, 2002 10:01 PM
To: ruby-talk ML
Subject: RE: Ruby developers: help push RPKG development and
usage forward!!(it is like CPAN.pm, only Ruby)On Tue, 2002-08-27 at 19:32, Rich Kilmer wrote:
Notice…pure Ruby…no C…dynamically loading and calling .dlls.
Cool eh?
And it is part of Ruby 1.7.2 (in CVS).
-Rich Kilmer
i think i want to try it now. can i install 1.7.2 along side
1.6.7? or is it stable enough now that i should just dump the
old version? (running debian linux woody by the way)thanks,
tom
I wrote:
Can we please give a hand to us Windows (l)users and use as much as
possible Ruby itself as a maker script?
Massimiliano Mirra wrote:
Giuseppe, that’s the idea. I’m writing bash scripts for testing
convenience only.
The goal now is to let the new rpkg acquire a defined form, so I’m
taking many shortcuts. Then, time for code sweeping and cleaning will
come, which includes replacing all Unixisms with pure ruby code.
Provided Windows users agree to do some testing and bugfixing
themselves, that is, as I’m not installing it anytime soon. ;->So, again, don’t worry. Your wishes are already on my todo list.
In this case, I volunteer for some crash testing under Windows
–
Giuseppe “Oblomov” Bilotta
Axiom I of the Giuseppe Bilotta
theory of IT:
Anything is better than MS
uh, sorry, how do i get 1.7.2? i tried anonymous cvs but it said NO. did
i do something wrong or is there an easier way to get it?
~tom
On Tue, 2002-08-27 at 21:07, Rich Kilmer wrote:
You can just install it in another directory and then go to that
directory to start Ruby or just replace your 1.6.7 installation…up to
you.I have been running 1.7.x for six months on Win32 and Linux. Bugs pop
up now and then, but nothing major (from my perspective).-rich
-----Original Message-----
From: Tom Sawyer [mailto:transami@transami.net]
Sent: Tuesday, August 27, 2002 10:01 PM
To: ruby-talk ML
Subject: RE: Ruby developers: help push RPKG development and
usage forward!!(it is like CPAN.pm, only Ruby)On Tue, 2002-08-27 at 19:32, Rich Kilmer wrote:
Notice…pure Ruby…no C…dynamically loading and calling .dlls.
Cool eh?
And it is part of Ruby 1.7.2 (in CVS).
-Rich Kilmer
i think i want to try it now. can i install 1.7.2 along side
1.6.7? or is it stable enough now that i should just dump the
old version? (running debian linux woody by the way)thanks,
tom
–
~transami
Nightly CVS snapshot:
ftp://ftp.ruby-lang.org/pub/ruby/snapshot.tar.gz
-rich
-----Original Message-----
From: Tom Sawyer [mailto:transami@transami.net]
Sent: Tuesday, August 27, 2002 11:25 PM
To: ruby-talk ML
Subject: RE: Ruby developers: help push RPKG development and
usageforward!!(it is like CPAN.pm, only Ruby)uh, sorry, how do i get 1.7.2? i tried anonymous cvs but it
said NO. did i do something wrong or is there an easier way to get it?~tom
On Tue, 2002-08-27 at 21:07, Rich Kilmer wrote:
You can just install it in another directory and then go to that
directory to start Ruby or just replace your 1.6.7
installation…up
to you.I have been running 1.7.x for six months on Win32 and
Linux. Bugs pop
up now and then, but nothing major (from my perspective).-rich
-----Original Message-----
From: Tom Sawyer [mailto:transami@transami.net]
Sent: Tuesday, August 27, 2002 10:01 PM
To: ruby-talk ML
Subject: RE: Ruby developers: help push RPKG development and
usage forward!!(it is like CPAN.pm, only Ruby)On Tue, 2002-08-27 at 19:32, Rich Kilmer wrote:
Notice…pure Ruby…no C…dynamically loading and
calling .dlls.Cool eh?
And it is part of Ruby 1.7.2 (in CVS).
-Rich Kilmer
i think i want to try it now. can i install 1.7.2 along side
1.6.7? or is it stable enough now that i should just dump the
old version? (running debian linux woody by the way)thanks,
tom–
~transami
You can go to packages.debian.org and get the .deb for ruby1.7 from
sarge (testing) or sid (unstable).
Massimiliano
On Wed, Aug 28, 2002 at 12:25:05PM +0900, Tom Sawyer wrote:
uh, sorry, how do i get 1.7.2? i tried anonymous cvs but it said NO. did
i do something wrong or is there an easier way to get it?
Have you tried with password = anonymous ?
On Wed, Aug 28, 2002 at 12:25:05PM +0900, Tom Sawyer wrote:
uh, sorry, how do i get 1.7.2? i tried anonymous cvs but it said NO. did
i do something wrong or is there an easier way to get it?
–
_ _
__ __ | | ___ _ __ ___ __ _ _ __
'_ \ /| __/ __| '__ \ / ` | ’ \
) | (| | |__ \ | | | | | (| | | | |
.__/ _,|_|/| || ||_,|| |_|
Running Debian GNU/Linux Sid (unstable)
batsman dot geo at yahoo dot com
C is quirky, flawed, and an enormous success
– Dennis M. Ritchie
just complied and drew up an error:
ar: no operation specified
i’ll see what i can figure out, byt does anyone know whay i might get
this?
~transami
On Tue, 2002-08-27 at 21:35, Rich Kilmer wrote:
Nightly CVS snapshot:
ftp://ftp.ruby-lang.org/pub/ruby/snapshot.tar.gz
-rich
-----Original Message-----
From: Tom Sawyer [mailto:transami@transami.net]
Sent: Tuesday, August 27, 2002 11:25 PM
To: ruby-talk ML
Subject: RE: Ruby developers: help push RPKG development and
usageforward!!(it is like CPAN.pm, only Ruby)uh, sorry, how do i get 1.7.2? i tried anonymous cvs but it
said NO. did i do something wrong or is there an easier way to get it?~tom
On Tue, 2002-08-27 at 21:07, Rich Kilmer wrote:
You can just install it in another directory and then go to that
directory to start Ruby or just replace your 1.6.7
installation…up
to you.I have been running 1.7.x for six months on Win32 and
Linux. Bugs pop
up now and then, but nothing major (from my perspective).-rich
-----Original Message-----
From: Tom Sawyer [mailto:transami@transami.net]
Sent: Tuesday, August 27, 2002 10:01 PM
To: ruby-talk ML
Subject: RE: Ruby developers: help push RPKG development and
usage forward!!(it is like CPAN.pm, only Ruby)On Tue, 2002-08-27 at 19:32, Rich Kilmer wrote:
Notice…pure Ruby…no C…dynamically loading and
calling .dlls.Cool eh?
And it is part of Ruby 1.7.2 (in CVS).
-Rich Kilmer
i think i want to try it now. can i install 1.7.2 along side
1.6.7? or is it stable enough now that i should just dump the
old version? (running debian linux woody by the way)thanks,
tom–
~transami
–
~transami
From Tom Sawyer 1030511597.793.982.camel@silver
just complied and drew up an error:
ar: no operation specified
i’ll see what i can figure out, byt does anyone know whay i might get
this?
Because configure.in was changed.
Is this a bug?
–
K.Kosako
crap! i knew i shouldn’t have run autoconf. i bet that did it. yes?
i’ll retry without.
thanks,
transami
On Tue, 2002-08-27 at 23:18, K.Kosako wrote:
From Tom Sawyer 1030511597.793.982.camel@silver
just complied and drew up an error:
ar: no operation specified
i’ll see what i can figure out, byt does anyone know whay i might get
this?Because configure.in was changed.
Is this a bug?–
K.Kosako
–
~transami
Hi,
In message “Re: Ruby developers: help push RPKG development and usageforward!!(it is like CPAN.pm, only Ruby)” on 02/08/28, “K.Kosako” kosako@sofnec.co.jp writes:
From Tom Sawyer 1030511597.793.982.camel@silver
just complied and drew up an error:
ar: no operation specified
i’ll see what i can figure out, byt does anyone know whay i might get
this?Because configure.in was changed.
Is this a bug?
Hmm, I changed configure.in, but it works for me. Could you give me
more info about “the bug”?
matz.
on second thought that’s not it b/c you have to run autoconf to get
./configure
hmmm…guess it is a bug in the current snapshot.
~tom
On Tue, 2002-08-27 at 23:18, K.Kosako wrote:
From Tom Sawyer 1030511597.793.982.camel@silver
just complied and drew up an error:
ar: no operation specified
i’ll see what i can figure out, byt does anyone know whay i might get
this?Because configure.in was changed.
Is this a bug?–
K.Kosako
–
~transami
thanks matz,
boy, you’re like a superhero! you come out of nowhere to save the day!
so how do i get a more verbose output on make?
here’s what i have now, see attachments, plus:
ar: no operation specified
make: *** [libruby.a] Error 1
~transami
my_configure.info (7.55 KB)
my_make.info (1.42 KB)
On Tue, 2002-08-27 at 23:31, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
Hi,
In message “Re: Ruby developers: help push RPKG development and usageforward!!(it is like CPAN.pm, only Ruby)” > on 02/08/28, “K.Kosako” kosako@sofnec.co.jp writes:
From Tom Sawyer 1030511597.793.982.camel@silver
just complied and drew up an error:
ar: no operation specified
i’ll see what i can figure out, byt does anyone know whay i might get
this?Because configure.in was changed.
Is this a bug?Hmm, I changed configure.in, but it works for me. Could you give me
more info about “the bug”?matz.
–
~transami
Hi,
In message “Re: Ruby developers: help push RPKG development and usageforward!!(it is like CPAN.pm, only Ruby)” on 02/08/28, Tom Sawyer transami@transami.net writes:
so how do i get a more verbose output on make?
here’s what i have now, see attachments, plus:
ar: no operation specified
make: *** [libruby.a] Error 1
That’s enough. It seems the change should be reverted. Thank you for
the report.
matz.
thanks matz, it works now.
~transami
On Tue, 2002-08-27 at 23:58, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
That’s enough. It seems the change should be reverted. Thank you for
the report.