Ruby 1.8.1 REXML performance

Quoteing mvondung@gmx.net, on Wed, Feb 04, 2004 at 12:35:02AM +0900:

You are the only one talking with you in this thread. Do you really
think that someone else will do your job ? Do it for free ?

Hmm, that’s the third or fifth message I am reading from you today,
and they all were negative and/or rude. You don’t seem to like Ruby or
its community much. Someone asked you, in another thread, if you are a
troll. I believe the question was on target.

Yes, no doubt, i’m not an open source fan.

Which is particularly weird, given that Lothar is the principle of a
company which claims to be developing IDEs for open source scripting
languages (betas expected at end of the year…)!

Like Ruby:

http://www.ruby-ide.com/arachno_ruby.php

Maybe its a troll impersonating him?
Or he has MPD?

···

On Mon, 2 Feb 2004 04:01:09 +0900, Lothar Scholz mailinglists@scriptolutions.com wrote:


If you can read this, you’re too close.
Rasputin :: Jack of All Trades - Master of Nuns

Zach Dennis wrote:

Open Source is wonderful. It allows folks to focus on the best possible
service they can offer and not on “mine mine mine” concept that children at
the age of 2 get so well. Perhaps that is my new fav analogy of Open Source
vs. Closed Source developers. Open Sourcer’s are compared to children older
then that of 2 who have learned to share, while Closed Source developers can
be compared to children at the age of 2. I wonder what’ll happen when
developers reach adolesence. =)

They will stop programming and focus on the opposite sex.

Hal

Lol…

So they’ve already reached adolescence - right?

Microsoft vs Sun

SCO vs Linux

Windows vs. Mac

-Rich

···

----- Original Message -----
From: “Hal Fulton” hal9000@hypermetrics.com
To: “ruby-talk ML” ruby-talk@ruby-lang.org
Sent: Sunday, February 01, 2004 3:34 PM
Subject: Re: (OT) Open Source != Do it yourself (was: Re: Ruby 1.8.1 REXML
performance)

Zach Dennis wrote:

Open Source is wonderful. It allows folks to focus on the best possible
service they can offer and not on “mine mine mine” concept that children
at
the age of 2 get so well. Perhaps that is my new fav analogy of Open
Source
vs. Closed Source developers. Open Sourcer’s are compared to children
older
then that of 2 who have learned to share, while Closed Source developers
can
be compared to children at the age of 2. I wonder what’ll happen when
developers reach adolesence. =)

They will stop programming and focus on the opposite sex.

Hal