Don't let that grind you down, you'll always find people willing to
help you here, you have made a smart choice with ruby, we should
encourage that.
It get tiresome at times. I'm doing what I can to avoid leaving any weird setups for my offshore replacement.
I don't have a RHEL here right now, but if I get my hands on one I'll
let you know.
White Box Linux is a clone of RHEL 3.0. I've been using it for testing while waiting for the RedHat Licenses to arrive. Very cool. I need to set up a User Mode Linux virtual machine running it on one of my systems at home.
-- Matt
It's not what I know that counts, it's what I can remember in time to use.
···
On Tue, 28 Sep 2004, vruz wrote:
Your answer is a valid one, and may even be the best one for Matt's situation.
I can't speak for Carl, but my comment was meant to support the
creation of packages. I'm not saying "install from source" is bad
advice, I'm saying I wish there were more alternatives.
Having burned a weekend (2 wks ago) trying to get the perfect setup to
install/compile mod_ruby and Arrow on Win32 -- without success -- I
may be a bit jaded 
···
Matt Lawrence <matt@technoronin.com> wrote:
I'm trying to find rpms for the latest released version of Ruby.
Carl Youngblood <carl.youngblood@gmail.com> wrote:
Having a standard ruby RPM would do a lot to promote the wider
availabiltiy and distribution of ruby. Telling someone to install
from source does not handle every contingency.
Markus <markus@reality.com> wrote:
I provided information to someone facing a problem
regarding 1) how I solved a similar problem (albeit with only a few
dozen machines) and 2) that it was not particularly difficult.
--
Bill Guindon (aka aGorilla)