Regex confusion

I was trying to get some matches: as below

"191760250", "This is a test", "2013-04-07T17:19:06.953", "131466368",
"191760250", "Does it wotk", "2013-04-07T17:19:17.303", "131466368"

accordingly made http://rubular.com/r/EiV1uFySaN

but not working.

please help me.

···

--
Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.

It's best to parse xml with an xml parser. The try Nokogiri:
http://rubygems.org/gems/nokogiri

-Josh

···

On Mon, Apr 8, 2013 at 4:44 PM, Love U Ruby <lists@ruby-forum.com> wrote:

I was trying to get some matches: as below

"191760250", "This is a test", "2013-04-07T17:19:06.953", "131466368",
"191760250", "Does it wotk", "2013-04-07T17:19:17.303", "131466368"

accordingly made Rubular: (>([\w\s]|[\d\-\:.])+<)

but not working.

please help me.

--
Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/\.

I would try this modified expression:

···

(([\w\s]|[\d\-\:.])+?)<

Sent from my iPhone

On Apr 8, 2013, at 2:48 PM, Josh Cheek <josh.cheek@gmail.com> wrote:

It's best to parse xml with an xml parser. The try Nokogiri: nokogiri | RubyGems.org | your community gem host

-Josh

On Mon, Apr 8, 2013 at 4:44 PM, Love U Ruby <lists@ruby-forum.com> wrote:

I was trying to get some matches: as below

"191760250", "This is a test", "2013-04-07T17:19:06.953", "131466368",
"191760250", "Does it wotk", "2013-04-07T17:19:17.303", "131466368"

accordingly made Rubular: (>([\w\s]|[\d\-\:.])+<)

but not working.

please help me.

--
Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/\.

What XML? This looks more like a case for CSV.

Cheers

robert

···

On Mon, Apr 8, 2013 at 11:48 PM, Josh Cheek <josh.cheek@gmail.com> wrote:

It's best to parse xml with an xml parser. The try Nokogiri:
nokogiri | RubyGems.org | your community gem host

--
remember.guy do |as, often| as.you_can - without end
http://blog.rubybestpractices.com/

If you check the rubular link the OP posted, the sample string is an XML.

Jesus.

···

On Tue, Apr 9, 2013 at 9:35 AM, Robert Klemme <shortcutter@googlemail.com> wrote:

On Mon, Apr 8, 2013 at 11:48 PM, Josh Cheek <josh.cheek@gmail.com> wrote:

It's best to parse xml with an xml parser. The try Nokogiri:
http://rubygems.org/gems/nokogiri

What XML? This looks more like a case for CSV.