[QUIZ] One-Liners (#113)

Yes, Robert's messages are sent as multipart/alternative. Here's the header from his latest one:

Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_86388_20605457.1171389368901"

The Gateway's current Usenet host doesn't support this message format. (It's not technically a legal Usenet post.) You can read more about this at:

James Edward Gray II

···

On Feb 13, 2007, at 1:30 PM, Simon Kröger wrote:

Alex Young wrote:

Robert Dober wrote:

Hi All! Hi James! Hi Robert!

just wanted to note that there seems to be not a single message
from Robert on the newsgroup side of life.

gmail...

Cheers
Robert

···

On 2/13/07, James Edward Gray II <james@grayproductions.net> wrote:

On Feb 13, 2007, at 1:30 PM, Simon Kröger wrote:

> Alex Young wrote:
>> Robert Dober wrote:
>
> Hi All! Hi James! Hi Robert!
>
> just wanted to note that there seems to be not a single message
> from Robert on the newsgroup side of life.

Yes, Robert's messages are sent as multipart/alternative. Here's the
header from his latest one:

Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----
=_Part_86388_20605457.1171389368901"

The Gateway's current Usenet host doesn't support this message
format. (It's not technically a legal Usenet post.) You can read
more about this at:

http://blog.grayproductions.net/articles/2006/12/01/what-is-the-ruby-
talk-gateway

James Edward Gray II

Thx a lot to both of you for this vital info. I'll try to twist my

--
We have not succeeded in answering all of our questions.
In fact, in some ways, we are more confused than ever.
But we feel we are confused on a higher level and about more important
things.
-Anonymous

James Edward Gray II schrieb:

···

On Feb 13, 2007, at 1:30 PM, Simon Kröger wrote:

Alex Young wrote:

Robert Dober wrote:

Hi All! Hi James! Hi Robert!

just wanted to note that there seems to be not a single message
from Robert on the newsgroup side of life.

Yes, Robert's messages are sent as multipart/alternative. Here's the header from his latest one:

Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_86388_20605457.1171389368901"

The Gateway's current Usenet host doesn't support this message format. (It's not technically a legal Usenet post.) You can read more about this at:

Gray Soft / Not Found

James Edward Gray II

Sorry for not reading that before, i wasn't aware of that resource.

So Robert, would you please configure your mail-client?
(I would really like to read your posts)

cheers

Simon

Thanx
Did you get this one?

I just switched off "Rich formatting" I did not find much else to do :frowning:

Robert

···

On 2/13/07, Simon Kröger <SimonKroeger@gmx.de> wrote:

James Edward Gray II schrieb:
> On Feb 13, 2007, at 1:30 PM, Simon Kröger wrote:
>
>> Alex Young wrote:
>>> Robert Dober wrote:
>>
>> Hi All! Hi James! Hi Robert!
>>
>> just wanted to note that there seems to be not a single message
>> from Robert on the newsgroup side of life.
>
> Yes, Robert's messages are sent as multipart/alternative. Here's the
> header from his latest one:
>
> Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
> boundary="----=_Part_86388_20605457.1171389368901"
>
> The Gateway's current Usenet host doesn't support this message format.
> (It's not technically a legal Usenet post.) You can read more about
> this at:
>
> Gray Soft / Not Found
>
> James Edward Gray II

Sorry for not reading that before, i wasn't aware of that resource.

So Robert, would you please configure your mail-client?
(I would really like to read your posts)

cheers

Simon

--
We have not succeeded in answering all of our questions.
In fact, in some ways, we are more confused than ever.
But we feel we are confused on a higher level and about more important things.
-Anonymous

Robert Dober wrote:

Thanx
Did you get this one?

Yes!

I just switched off "Rich formatting" I did not find much else to do :frowning:

You do not have to do any more than that. Thanks.

Robert

cheers

Simon

Great; great, thx to you and apologies to the list for the noise.
But it might be a good thing to know for all fellow g-mailers :slight_smile:

Cheers
Robert

···

On 2/14/07, Simon Kröger <SimonKroeger@gmx.de> wrote:

Robert Dober wrote:

> Thanx
> Did you get this one?

Yes!

> I just switched off "Rich formatting" I did not find much else to do :frowning:

You do not have to do any more than that. Thanks.

> Robert

cheers

Simon

--
We have not succeeded in answering all of our questions.
In fact, in some ways, we are more confused than ever.
But we feel we are confused on a higher level and about more important things.
-Anonymous