Proposal to create a new mailing list

} >On Sun, Dec 31, 2006 at 08:07:05AM +0900, pat eyler wrote:
} >[...]
} >} Anyone want to take that a bit further and post a URL or two for
} >} blog posts that you think should get more discussion here? There's
} >} a lot of gold in them thar blogs -- if only there are enough people
} >} interested in mining it.
} >
} >Well, I'll pimp my own Ruby blog. I only have a very few posts there, but I
} >generally only post when I learn something really interesting or come up
} >with a good way of doing something interesting, for varying values of
} >interesting.
} >
} >http://redcorundum.blogspot.com/
}
} Nice. Do you have a couple of favorite posts from your blog?
} Something you'd like the ruby-talk/clr/ruby-forum to know about?
[...]

I only have a dozen posts, total, so I could be justified in suggesting
that you just read the whole thing, but I'll point to a few I'm
particularly pleased with:

http://redcorundum.blogspot.com/2006/09/simple-flyweight-implementation_26.html
http://redcorundum.blogspot.com/2006/07/symbolickeyhash.html
http://redcorundum.blogspot.com/2006/05/kernelqualifiedconstget.html

} thanks,
} -pate
--Greg

···

On Sun, Dec 31, 2006 at 10:36:44AM +0900, pat eyler wrote:
} On 12/30/06, Gregory Seidman <gsslist+ruby@anthropohedron.net> wrote:

Apart from implementation which might be impossible it might be nice to have
an instance (a person as a robot will not do :frowning: ) which just transfers basic
posts into a newbie or basic list. All posts are made to the original ML but
about 15-20% are transferred not because it is newbie but it has been asked
agian and again and again.

Just an additional thaught, not a solution :frowning:

Happy New Year C U 2007

Robert

···

--
"The real romance is out ahead and yet to come. The computer revolution
hasn't started yet. Don't be misled by the enormous flow of money into bad
defacto standards for unsophisticated buyers using poor adaptations of
incomplete ideas."

- Alan Kay