I want to add Sketchup features, a product that has an API only for
Ruby, so I've decided that Ruby is the right choice. I've Googled up
lists of tutorials, tried a few. Any recommendations? (I'm an
experienced OO programmer.)
Thanks in advance.
Martin Rinehart wrote:
I want to add Sketchup features, a product that has an API only for
Ruby, so I've decided that Ruby is the right choice. I've Googled up
lists of tutorials, tried a few. Any recommendations? (I'm an
experienced OO programmer.)
What is the question?
Yes, Ruby and Sketchup would be a blast; I can't wait to try it myself.
Here's some Ruby to keep you interested:
···
--
Phlip
Martin Rinehart wrote:
I want to add Sketchup features, a product that has an API only for
Ruby, so I've decided that Ruby is the right choice. I've Googled up
lists of tutorials, tried a few. Any recommendations? (I'm an
experienced OO programmer.)
http://www.ruby-doc.org/docs/ProgrammingRuby/
···
--
Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.
What tutorial or book or ??? is best for learning Ruby?
Great link!
http://code.google.com/apis/sketchup/
The best learning resource sort of depends on where you are coming
from and your programming style. I'm sort of a resource manual type
of person instead of a tutorial person, for example.
Todd
···
On Thu, Mar 5, 2009 at 2:33 PM, Martin Rinehart <MartinRinehart@gmail.com> wrote:
On Mar 5, 2:45 pm, Phlip <phlip2...@gmail.com> wrote:
What is the question?
What tutorial or book or ??? is best for learning Ruby?
Martin Rinehart wrote:
What is the question?
What tutorial or book or ??? is best for learning Ruby?
I always preferred Try Ruby as the quickest way to jump in:
Of course, it's a little bit outdated, especially the download links it has at the end. But it's still absolutely genius.
After that, I couldn't say. Someone else will probably suggest a book, and that's good, too. I would say, Google is your friend -- it doesn't take any longer to do this
than it does to ask us.
···
On Mar 5, 2:45 pm, Phlip <phlip2...@gmail.com> wrote:
Thanks! (Make that "hobix", Google tells me.)
Google lacks the "don't just list them, rank them by quality" feature.
···
On Mar 5, 5:56 pm, David Masover <ni...@slaphack.com> wrote:
I always preferred Try Ruby as the quickest way to jump in:
You can also try your code at http://codepad.org/?lang=Ruby
Regards,
Park Heesob
···
2009/3/6 Martin Rinehart <MartinRinehart@gmail.com>:
On Mar 5, 5:56 pm, David Masover <ni...@slaphack.com> wrote:
I always preferred Try Ruby as the quickest way to jump in:
Thanks! (Make that "hobix", Google tells me.)
Google lacks the "don't just list them, rank them by quality" feature.