Is anyone using the ruby_no_expensive ‘mode’ for vim syntax
highlighting? I’m thinking of either improving it or ripping it out -
hopefully the latter. 
Thanks,
Doug
I’ve never heard of it. 
Gavin
···
On Tuesday, July 29, 2003, 11:48:37 PM, Doug wrote:
Is anyone using the ruby_no_expensive ‘mode’ for vim syntax
highlighting? I’m thinking of either improving it or ripping it out -
hopefully the latter.
- Doug Kearns djkea2@mugca.its.monash.edu.au [Jul, 29 2003 15:50]:
Is anyone using the ruby_no_expensive ‘mode’ for vim syntax
highlighting? I’m thinking of either improving it or ripping it out -
hopefully the latter.
hm…haven’t really decided what i like best:
let ruby_no_identifiers = 1
let ruby_no_expensive = 1
or
unlet! ruby_no_identifiers
unlet! ruby_no_expensive
the first has many merits, but almost everything is highlighted, and
that can be rather annoying. the second highlights a lot less, which
means it’s hard to tell differences between object variables and local.
nikolai
···
–
::: name: Nikolai Weibull :: aliases: pcp / lone-star :::
::: born: Chicago, IL USA :: loc atm: Gothenburg, Sweden :::
::: page: www.pcppopper.org :: fun atm: gf,lps,ruby,php,war3 :::
main(){printf(&linux[“\021%six\012\0”],(linux)[“have”]+“fun”-97);}
I find the two options there counter-intuitive (most syntax items use if
exists(), not if !exists()), so I never knew about them.
However, I prefer having the context-sensitive highlighting.
-austin
···
On Tue, 29 Jul 2003 22:48:37 +0900, Doug Kearns wrote:
Is anyone using the ruby_no_expensive ‘mode’ for vim syntax highlighting?
I’m thinking of either improving it or ripping it out - hopefully the
latter.
–
austin ziegler * austin@halostatue.ca * Toronto, ON, Canada
software designer * pragmatic programmer * 2003.07.29
* 13.12.55