[OT] New Language

I think I am going to start a new language, just so
when people ask me to change it I can tell them
to fork-off...their own version.

Sorry, just couldn't resist. Matz can be so funny sometimes.

···

--
Jim Freeze

I think I am going to start a new language, just so when
people ask me to change it I can tell them to fork-off...their
own version.

Not to mention all the puns available for when you "freeze" the
source tree for release...

Sorry, just couldn't resist.

Likewise. :slight_smile:

Cheers!
Tim Hammerquist

···

Jim Freeze <jim@freeze.org> wrote:

Great. You can call your language the "Ladies Club". Pretty shallow
Jim.

Tim Hammerquist wrote:

I think I am going to start a new language, just so when
people ask me to change it I can tell them to fork-off...their
own version.

Not to mention all the puns available for when you "freeze" the
source tree for release...

Sorry, just couldn't resist.

Call the language "Frozen"

When people ask for changes, tell them it won't happen. The language is Frozen.

Pretty cool, no?

And slick!

Might be too hard, though.

James

···

Jim Freeze <jim@freeze.org> wrote:

--

http://www.ruby-doc.org - The Ruby Documentation Site
http://www.rubyxml.com - News, Articles, and Listings for Ruby & XML
http://www.rubystuff.com - The Ruby Store for Ruby Stuff
http://www.jamesbritt.com - Playing with Better Toys

Hi --

···

On Fri, 21 Oct 2005, James Britt wrote:

Tim Hammerquist wrote:

Jim Freeze <jim@freeze.org> wrote:

I think I am going to start a new language, just so when
people ask me to change it I can tell them to fork-off...their
own version.

Not to mention all the puns available for when you "freeze" the
source tree for release...

Sorry, just couldn't resist.

Call the language "Frozen"

When people ask for changes, tell them it won't happen. The language is Frozen.

Pretty cool, no?

And slick!

Might be too hard, though.

And a bit britt-le.

David

--
David A. Black
dblack@wobblini.net

Many are cold, but few are frozen.

···

On 10/20/05, James Britt <james_b@neurogami.com> wrote:

Call the language "Frozen"

When people ask for changes, tell them it won't happen. The language is
Frozen.

--
Adam Wildavsky <adam@tameware.com> http://www.tameware.com

> Tim Hammerquist wrote:
>> Not to mention all the puns available for when you "freeze" the
>> source tree for release...

[snip]

> Might be too hard, though.

And a bit britt-le.

Of course, considering you are creating the language just to spite
users, you might be labeled as a "black sheep."

···

On 10/20/05, David A. Black <dblack@wobblini.net> wrote:

On Fri, 21 Oct 2005, James Britt wrote:

--
Rob

And many would complain you robbed other languages for the cool
features in your language.

Ryan

···

On 10/20/05, Rob Rypka <rascal1182@gmail.com> wrote:

On 10/20/05, David A. Black <dblack@wobblini.net> wrote:
> On Fri, 21 Oct 2005, James Britt wrote:
> > Tim Hammerquist wrote:
> >> Not to mention all the puns available for when you "freeze" the
> >> source tree for release...

[snip]

> > Might be too hard, though.
>
> And a bit britt-le.

Of course, considering you are creating the language just to spite
users, you might be labeled as a "black sheep."

And criticise you for not leavengood enough alone.

martin

···

Ryan Leavengood <leavengood@gmail.com> wrote:

On 10/20/05, Rob Rypka <rascal1182@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 10/20/05, David A. Black <dblack@wobblini.net> wrote:
> > On Fri, 21 Oct 2005, James Britt wrote:
> > > Tim Hammerquist wrote:
> > >> Not to mention all the puns available for when you "freeze" the
> > >> source tree for release...
>
> [snip]
>
> > > Might be too hard, though.
> >
> > And a bit britt-le.
>
> Of course, considering you are creating the language just to spite
> users, you might be labeled as a "black sheep."

And many would complain you robbed other languages for the cool
features in your language.

Ryan Leavengood wrote:

Tim Hammerquist wrote:

Not to mention all the puns available for when you "freeze" the
source tree for release...

[snip]

Might be too hard, though.

And a bit britt-le.

Of course, considering you are creating the language just to spite
users, you might be labeled as a "black sheep."

And many would complain you robbed other languages for the cool
features in your language.

But all you need is ten or 'leven good features.

James

···

On 10/20/05, Rob Rypka <rascal1182@gmail.com> wrote:

On 10/20/05, David A. Black <dblack@wobblini.net> wrote:

On Fri, 21 Oct 2005, James Britt wrote:

Ryan

--

http://www.ruby-doc.org - The Ruby Documentation Site
http://www.rubyxml.com - News, Articles, and Listings for Ruby & XML
http://www.rubystuff.com - The Ruby Store for Ruby Stuff
http://www.jamesbritt.com - Playing with Better Toys

Of course if you didn't end up using it Ryan, one could say that you were Leaven-a-good thing behind

-Ezra

···

On Oct 20, 2005, at 1:48 PM, Ryan Leavengood wrote:

On 10/20/05, Rob Rypka <rascal1182@gmail.com> wrote:

On 10/20/05, David A. Black <dblack@wobblini.net> wrote:

On Fri, 21 Oct 2005, James Britt wrote:

Tim Hammerquist wrote:

Not to mention all the puns available for when you "freeze" the
source tree for release...

[snip]

Might be too hard, though.

And a bit britt-le.

Of course, considering you are creating the language just to spite
users, you might be labeled as a "black sheep."

And many would complain you robbed other languages for the cool
features in your language.

Ryan

At yeast the language wouldn't be unleavened.

Tom

···

On Fri, 2005-10-21 at 06:06 +0900, Martin DeMello wrote:

Ryan Leavengood <leavengood@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 10/20/05, Rob Rypka <rascal1182@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On 10/20/05, David A. Black <dblack@wobblini.net> wrote:
> > > On Fri, 21 Oct 2005, James Britt wrote:
> > > > Tim Hammerquist wrote:
> > > >> Not to mention all the puns available for when you "freeze" the
> > > >> source tree for release...
> >
> > [snip]
> >
> > > > Might be too hard, though.
> > >
> > > And a bit britt-le.
> >
> > Of course, considering you are creating the language just to spite
> > users, you might be labeled as a "black sheep."
>
> And many would complain you robbed other languages for the cool
> features in your language.

And criticise you for not leavengood enough alone.

This thread has gone too far. I can't cope with it anymore.

Brian.

···

On 10/20/05, Tom Copeland <tom@infoether.com> wrote:

On Fri, 2005-10-21 at 06:06 +0900, Martin DeMello wrote:
> Ryan Leavengood <leavengood@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On 10/20/05, Rob Rypka <rascal1182@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > On 10/20/05, David A. Black <dblack@wobblini.net> wrote:
> > > > On Fri, 21 Oct 2005, James Britt wrote:
> > > > > Tim Hammerquist wrote:
> > > > >> Not to mention all the puns available for when you "freeze" the
> > > > >> source tree for release...
> > >
> > > [snip]
> > >
> > > > > Might be too hard, though.
> > > >
> > > > And a bit britt-le.
> > >
> > > Of course, considering you are creating the language just to spite
> > > users, you might be labeled as a "black sheep."
> >
> > And many would complain you robbed other languages for the cool
> > features in your language.
>
> And criticise you for not leavengood enough alone.

At yeast the language wouldn't be unleavened.

Tom

ROFL. And I thought you guys would have a tough time adding my name to the joke!

:smiley:

Ryan

···

On 10/20/05, Brian Mitchell <binary42@gmail.com> wrote:

This thread has gone too far. I can't cope with it anymore.

Brian Mitchell wrote:

Tim Hammerquist wrote:

Not to mention all the puns available for when you "freeze" the
source tree for release...

[snip]

Might be too hard, though.

And a bit britt-le.

Of course, considering you are creating the language just to spite
users, you might be labeled as a "black sheep."

And many would complain you robbed other languages for the cool
features in your language.

And criticise you for not leavengood enough alone.

At yeast the language wouldn't be unleavened.

Tom

This thread has gone too far. I can't cope with it anymore.

It makes your brian hurt? Not to worry, it will likely be gone
like the wind come morrow. The quistion is, though, will anyone
actually hammer out his specification or if it will be all just
left as the produce of this mellow afternoon? A worthwhile idea
albeit some might balk from it due to its uberlanguage philosophy.

Did I leave anyone out? Any of those bad enough for this to end yet?

Brian.

E

···

On 10/20/05, Tom Copeland <tom@infoether.com> wrote:

On Fri, 2005-10-21 at 06:06 +0900, Martin DeMello wrote:

Ryan Leavengood <leavengood@gmail.com> wrote:

On 10/20/05, Rob Rypka <rascal1182@gmail.com> wrote:

On 10/20/05, David A. Black <dblack@wobblini.net> wrote:

On Fri, 21 Oct 2005, James Britt wrote:

I'm brian' to come up with a good pun, but failing mitchellably.

···

On Oct 20, 2005, at 3:27 PM, Brian Mitchell wrote:

On 10/20/05, Tom Copeland <tom@infoether.com> wrote:

On Fri, 2005-10-21 at 06:06 +0900, Martin DeMello wrote:

Ryan Leavengood <leavengood@gmail.com> wrote:

On 10/20/05, Rob Rypka <rascal1182@gmail.com> wrote:

On 10/20/05, David A. Black <dblack@wobblini.net> wrote:

On Fri, 21 Oct 2005, James Britt wrote:

Tim Hammerquist wrote:

Not to mention all the puns available for when you "freeze" the
source tree for release...

[snip]

Might be too hard, though.

And a bit britt-le.

Of course, considering you are creating the language just to spite
users, you might be labeled as a "black sheep."

And many would complain you robbed other languages for the cool
features in your language.

And criticise you for not leavengood enough alone.

At yeast the language wouldn't be unleavened.

This thread has gone too far. I can't cope with it anymore.

At least you're gavin some fun, though!

···

On Fri, 2005-10-21 at 23:41 +0900, Gavin Kistner wrote:

On Oct 20, 2005, at 3:27 PM, Brian Mitchell wrote:
> On 10/20/05, Tom Copeland <tom@infoether.com> wrote:
>> On Fri, 2005-10-21 at 06:06 +0900, Martin DeMello wrote:
>>> Ryan Leavengood <leavengood@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> On 10/20/05, Rob Rypka <rascal1182@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>> On 10/20/05, David A. Black <dblack@wobblini.net> wrote:
>>>>>> On Fri, 21 Oct 2005, James Britt wrote:
>>>>>>> Tim Hammerquist wrote:
>>>>>>>> Not to mention all the puns available for when you "freeze" the
>>>>>>>> source tree for release...
>>>>> [snip]
>>>>>>> Might be too hard, though.
>>>>>> And a bit britt-le.
>>>>> Of course, considering you are creating the language just to spite
>>>>> users, you might be labeled as a "black sheep."
>>>> And many would complain you robbed other languages for the cool
>>>> features in your language.
>>> And criticise you for not leavengood enough alone.
>> At yeast the language wouldn't be unleavened.
> This thread has gone too far. I can't cope with it anymore.
I'm brian' to come up with a good pun, but failing mitchellably.

Tom Copeland wrote:

···

On Fri, 2005-10-21 at 23:41 +0900, Gavin Kistner wrote:
> On Oct 20, 2005, at 3:27 PM, Brian Mitchell wrote:
> > On 10/20/05, Tom Copeland <tom@infoether.com> wrote:
> > On Fri, 2005-10-21 at 06:06 +0900, Martin DeMello wrote:
> >> Ryan Leavengood <leavengood@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>> On 10/20/05, Rob Rypka <rascal1182@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>> On 10/20/05, David A. Black <dblack@wobblini.net> wrote:
> >>>>> On Fri, 21 Oct 2005, James Britt wrote:
> >>>>>> Tim Hammerquist wrote:
> >>>>>>> Not to mention all the puns available for when you "freeze" the
> >>>>>>> source tree for release...
> >>>> [snip]
> >>>>>> Might be too hard, though.
> >>>>> And a bit britt-le.
> >>>> Of course, considering you are creating the language just to spite
> >>>> users, you might be labeled as a "black sheep."
> >>> And many would complain you robbed other languages for the cool
> >>> features in your language.
> >> And criticise you for not leavengood enough alone.
> > At yeast the language wouldn't be unleavened.
> > This thread has gone too far. I can't cope with it anymore.
> I'm brian' to come up with a good pun, but failing mitchellably.
At least you're gavin some fun, though!

I kind of wish that this thread would be as quiet as a tom-b.

        nikolai

--
Nikolai Weibull: now available free of charge at http://bitwi.se/\!
Born in Chicago, IL USA; currently residing in Gothenburg, Sweden.
main(){printf(&linux["\021%six\012\0"],(linux)["have"]+"fun"-97);}

Nikolai Weibull wrote:

Tom Copeland wrote:

Tim Hammerquist wrote:
                 

Not to mention all the puns available for when you "freeze" the
source tree for release...
                   

[snip]
             

Might be too hard, though.
                 

And a bit britt-le.
               

Of course, considering you are creating the language just to spite
users, you might be labeled as a "black sheep."
             

And many would complain you robbed other languages for the cool
features in your language.
           

And criticise you for not leavengood enough alone.
         

At yeast the language wouldn't be unleavened.
This thread has gone too far. I can't cope with it anymore.
       

I'm brian' to come up with a good pun, but failing mitchellably.
     

At least you're gavin some fun, though!
   

I kind of wish that this thread would be as quiet as a tom-b.

I truwei bulleve this thread needs to come to an end.

···

On Fri, 2005-10-21 at 23:41 +0900, Gavin Kistner wrote:

On Oct 20, 2005, at 3:27 PM, Brian Mitchell wrote:

On 10/20/05, Tom Copeland <tom@infoether.com> wrote:
On Fri, 2005-10-21 at 06:06 +0900, Martin DeMello wrote:

Ryan Leavengood <leavengood@gmail.com> wrote:

On 10/20/05, Rob Rypka <rascal1182@gmail.com> wrote:

On 10/20/05, David A. Black <dblack@wobblini.net> wrote:

On Fri, 21 Oct 2005, James Britt wrote:

Devine what you will, be wei bull or bear. Copeng as we are, our
gavinized brians cannot leave n good taste while wild avsky *ughm*
advocacy and ez rants hold sway. Can speach mean mitch elless it be
"natura de mello"?. Nay. It be but unbrittled robbery that blacken our
names. Hammer d' quist home, and be quick. For tim is not on our side
and may freeze us in our transit, defamity and all, at any moment.