James Britt wrote:
Michael Campbell wrote:
You might want to re-think the codename here. While I’m not
offended
by it, it’s a bit beyond polite.Besides, I think the technical term is “moobs.”
Certainly gets attention.
But then so do moobs.
chuckle But is that the attention you /want/? =D
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Search - Find what youre looking for faster
Hmm
This is kinda reminiscent of the flame war I encountered on the Gnome mailing
list where one alpha release of gnome was announced as
Gnome 2.5.x “and a pair of testicles” is out!
Though there were many for-against arguments, I thought it was quite a useless
argument (but then again, it was a flame war =D ).
Anyhoo, I did re-think it and well decide against it.
Cheers!
Archit
P.S. hmm, moobs, hmm. maybe for the 0.2 release =D
Michael Campbell michael_s_campbell@yahoo.com writes:
James Britt wrote:
Michael Campbell wrote:
You might want to re-think the codename here. While I’m not
offended
by it, it’s a bit beyond polite.Besides, I think the technical term is “moobs.”
Certainly gets attention.
But then so do moobs.
chuckle But is that the attention you /want/? =D
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Search - Find what youre looking for faster
http://search.yahoo.com
