Jut a quick one, how do you translate this:
((if (zero? 0) + -) 3 4)
=> 7
to Ruby?
Cheers,
Douglas
Jut a quick one, how do you translate this:
((if (zero? 0) + -) 3 4)
=> 7
to Ruby?
Cheers,
Douglas
Douglas Livingstone wrote:
Jut a quick one, how do you translate this:
((if (zero? 0) + -) 3 4)
=> 7to Ruby?
Cheers,
Douglas
3.send(x.zero? ? :+ : :-, 4)
It's a little hard to read with all those colons. Maybe this is better:
3.send(if x.zero? then :+ else :- end, 4)
Or you could replace symbols with strings for readability, at a cost to speed:
p 3.send(x.zero? ? "+" : "-", 4)
--
vjoel : Joel VanderWerf : path berkeley edu : 510 665 3407
Douglas Livingstone wrote:
Jut a quick one, how do you translate this:
((if (zero? 0) + -) 3 4)
=> 7to Ruby?
Well, these kind of questions are rarely helpful; translating an
idiomatic expression out of context from one language is often useless,
because in a greater context the ruby code might be doing something
completely different to begin with.
But, if you want a one-liner...
3.method(0.zero? ? :+ : :-).call(4)
--
Neil Stevens - neil@hakubi.us
'A republic, if you can keep it.' -- Benjamin Franklin
7 if true
--Steve
On Dec 14, 2005, at 6:36 PM, Douglas Livingstone wrote:
((if (zero? 0) + -) 3 4)
=> 7to Ruby?
Douglas Livingstone wrote:
Just a quick one, how do you translate this:
((if (zero? 0) + -) 3 4)
What dialect of LISP is that? Not Common... CL has no "zero?"
(it's "zerop"), and + and - refer to input history rather than the functions
associated with the operators. To do something like that in CL I think
you have to use the characters '+ and '- and an (eval)...
Stephen Waits wrote:
((if (zero? 0) + -) 3 4)
=> 7to Ruby?
7 if true
--Steve
7
On Dec 14, 2005, at 6:36 PM, Douglas Livingstone wrote:
--
vjoel : Joel VanderWerf : path berkeley edu : 510 665 3407
It's Scheme. A much nicer dialect than CL, IMHO. ![]()
I think in CL the equivalent would be:
((if (zerop 0) #'+ #'-) 3 4)
Note the ugly sharp-quotes, due to the fact that CL has separate
namespaces for values and functions.
regards,
Ed
On Fri, Dec 16, 2005 at 07:22:39AM +0900, Mark J.Reed wrote:
Douglas Livingstone wrote:
> Just a quick one, how do you translate this:
>
> ((if (zero? 0) + -) 3 4)What dialect of LISP is that? Not Common... CL has no "zero?"
There - who says ruby isn't concise!
martin
Joel VanderWerf <vjoel@path.berkeley.edu> wrote:
Stephen Waits wrote:
>
> On Dec 14, 2005, at 6:36 PM, Douglas Livingstone wrote:
>
>> ((if (zero? 0) + -) 3 4)
>> => 7
>>
>> to Ruby?
>
>
> 7 if true
>
> --Steve7
Edward Faulkner <ef@alum.mit.edu> writes:
Douglas Livingstone wrote:
> Just a quick one, how do you translate this:
>
> ((if (zero? 0) + -) 3 4)What dialect of LISP is that? Not Common... CL has no "zero?"
It's Scheme. A much nicer dialect than CL, IMHO.
I think in CL the equivalent would be:
((if (zerop 0) #'+ #'-) 3 4)
No, you need:
(apply (if (zerop 0) #'+ #'-) '(3 4))
Note the ugly sharp-quotes, due to the fact that CL has separate
namespaces for values and functions.
And that is why. ![]()
On Fri, Dec 16, 2005 at 07:22:39AM +0900, Mark J.Reed wrote:
regards,
Ed
--
Christian Neukirchen <chneukirchen@gmail.com> http://chneukirchen.org