Is programming art?

There is a distinction between being useless and having no utility. I
content that art has no utility in that it does not have "the quality
of being of practical use" (the meaning of the word utility). That
does not mean that it is useless.

I agree that there is a subtle distinction I had not considered!

Is art useless? That is another question and not one that I was
addressing. Given that in around 6 billion years the sun will turn
into a Red Giant and all life on Earth will be eradicated then you
could view all human endeavour as useless :frowning:

Aye, you're right: it's another question. I have my faith in humanity
(or what it may become). In 6 billion years we might be symbiotic with
novae. :slight_smile:

That's kind of what I was trying to say.

The product of painting and the product of programming can be art, or it can
serve some practical purpose.

Take a look at the result of Natzke's programming:

It is clearly art.

···

On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 6:20 PM, Tony Arcieri <tony.arcieri@medioh.com>wrote:

On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 11:54 AM, Brian Jolly <brian@brianjolly.com> > wrote:

> The same question could be asked about painting. Is painting art?

It depends what you're painting (but you already answered your own
question...)

--
Tony Arcieri
Medioh! Kudelski