There is only so much that can be done to prevent spam, short of
charging $ per post.
That would not only reduce spam(mers) but also legit users
Reminds me of captchas.
They were implemented to reduce bots posting, but in the end they
just annoy me... I wasted so many times with captchas that if
I fail on first try, I leave the site. (Mind you, I am talking
about captchas with graphics. Some are soooo difficult to solve
without making an error ... soon we will have more bots solving
these tests than humans, as bots could reuse "problem
solving code" to solve that... BORG bot net )
There is only so much that can be done to prevent spam, short of
charging $ per post.
That would not only reduce spam(mers) but also legit users
Reminds me of captchas.
They were implemented to reduce bots posting, but in the end they
just annoy me... I wasted so many times with captchas that if
I fail on first try, I leave the site. (Mind you, I am talking
about captchas with graphics. Some are soooo difficult to solve
without making an error ... soon we will have more bots solving
these tests than humans, as bots could reuse "problem
solving code" to solve that... BORG bot net )
There is talk about a sort of "reversed CAPTCHA".
You provide your info, and log in / perform the action as normal, but
the CAPTCHA is hidden from you.
Captchas are very easy to handle. You just enters the distorted text shown
into a field.
···
On 9 apr 2008, at 09.20, Marc Heiler wrote:
There is only so much that can be done to prevent spam, short of
charging $ per post.
That would not only reduce spam(mers) but also legit users
Reminds me of captchas.
They were implemented to reduce bots posting, but in the end they
just annoy me... I wasted so many times with captchas that if
I fail on first try, I leave the site. (Mind you, I am talking
-----------------------------------
See the amazing new SF reel: Invasion of the man eating cucumbers from outer space.
On congratulations for a fantastic parody, the producer replies : "What parody?"