I think it may be time to retire NQXML.
Does anybody out there still use NQXML? I don’t want to abandon anyone, but it
doesn’t feel like NQXML is actively in use.
REXML is superior. REXML is bundled with Ruby. I use REXML now.
Writing and supporting NQXML was a really fun learning experience for me. I’d
like to thank everyone who has contributed to it and used it.
Jim
P.S. Yes, the .sig was hand-picked.
···
–
Jim Menard, jimm@io.com, http://www.io.com/~jimm/
“As far as I’ve seen, once those XML worms eat into your brain, it’s hard
to ever get anything practical done again. To an XML person, every nail
looks like a thumb. Or something like that.” – fejj on advogato.org
this make me wonder if my previous post did it to the ml/newsgroup…
Anyway thank your for NQXML, even if it’s late 
···
il 18 Mar 2004 06:59:49 -0600, Jim Menard jimm@io.com ha scritto::
I think it may be time to retire NQXML.
gabriele renzi surrender_it@remove.yahoo.it writes:
I think it may be time to retire NQXML.
this make me wonder if my previous post did it to the ml/newsgroup…
It did. I’ve been thinking about retiring NQXML for a while now. There has not
been much mention of it, except in messages like yours asking why there are so
many Ruby XML parsers out there.
Anyway thank your for NQXML, even if it’s late
It’s been my pleasure.
Jim
···
il 18 Mar 2004 06:59:49 -0600, Jim Menard jimm@io.com ha scritto::
–
Jim Menard, jimm@io.com, http://www.io.com/~jimm/
“The American legal system is, of course, just the British kernel with a
shorter uptime and a few clumsy security patches slapped in.”
– www.ntk.net