dblack@wobblini :
Since Interface is already the name of a Ruby library, pretty much any
other word (as long as it doesn't similarly shadow an existing
package) is automatically more suitable than Interface."Interfaces" and "Interfacer" come to mind -- not plum names, perhaps,
but (as far as I know) unambiguous and unclaimed in Ruby-space.
ImplementsInterface ?
-austin
···
--
austin ziegler * austin.ziegler@evault.com