...
Requests per second: 5.52 [#/sec] (mean)
Time per request: 1812.81 [ms] (mean)
Time per request: 181.28 [ms] (mean, across all concurrent requests)
Transfer rate: 18.35 [Kbytes/sec] received
Connnection Times (ms)
min mean[+/-sd] median max
Connect: 0 6 132.3 0 2960
Processing: 872 1794 644.9 1662 6216
Waiting: 871 1794 644.9 1661 6215
Total: 872 1800 655.4 1662 6216
...
Out of the box [2], Instiki manages to handle a bit less than 6 requests per second... which seems, well, kind of low all things being equal
What gives? Is such response rate to be expected? Did I mess up something?
Out of the box [2], Instiki manages to handle a bit less than 6 requests per second... which seems, well, kind of low all things being equal
Can you do the same on Instiki 0.10? On my PC it does ~30+ rec/sec. Still not very much, but a lot more than any Instiki installation is ever actually subjected to in the wild.
On Saturday 23 April 2005 06:48, Alexey Verkhovsky said something like:
PA wrote:
> Out of the box [2], Instiki manages to handle a bit less than 6
> requests per second... which seems, well, kind of low all things
> being equal
Can you do the same on Instiki 0.10? On my PC it does ~30+ rec/sec.
Still not very much, but a lot more than any Instiki installation is
ever actually subjected to in the wild.
Unless, of course, you manage to write an article that becomes of
interest to the Slashdot crowd.
j----- k-----
···
--
Joshua J. Kugler -- Fairbanks, Alaska -- ICQ#:13706295
Every knee shall bow, and every tongue confess, in heaven, on earth, and
under the earth, that Jesus Christ is LORD -- Count on it!
