Hi,
what is the preferred way to see if an object already includes a
instance variable?
for now i do something like:
@my_object.instance_variables.include? "var_name"
Cheers
detlef
Hi,
AFAIK it's the only way.
Question: Why does Object#instance_varialbe_get have no documentation?
It's behaviour isn't that clear in cases like
···
On 2/18/07, Detlef Reichl <detlef.reichl@gmx.org> wrote:
Hi,
what is the preferred way to see if an object already includes a
instance variable?for now i do something like:
@my_object.instance_variables.include? "var_name"
Cheers
detlef
Hi Detief, Aur,
> Hi,
>
> what is the preferred way to see if an object already includes a
> instance variable?
>
> for now i do something like:
>
> @my_object.instance_variables.include? "var_name"
>
Hi,AFAIK it's the only way.
There's also:
obj.instance_eval{defined?(@foo)}
As you're hopefully aware, though, it's probably not particularly
straightforward because it's discouraged in general. Peeking at an
object's instance variables is kinda intruding on its privacy. There
are some valid uses to be sure, but usually I think you're better off
providing accessors for anything of interest outside the object.
Question: Why does Object#instance_varialbe_get have no documentation?
It's behaviour isn't that clear in cases like
Where are you looking? "ri instance_variable_get" gives me docs.
Regards,
George.
···
On 2/19/07, SonOfLilit <sonoflilit@gmail.com> wrote:
On 2/18/07, Detlef Reichl <detlef.reichl@gmx.org> wrote:
aur-sarafs-computer:~ aursaraf$ ri Object#instance_variable_get -T
------------------------------------------- Object#instance_variable_get
instance_variable_get(ivarname)
···
------------------------------------------------------------------------
(no description...)
aur-sarafs-computer:~ aursaraf$ ruby -v
ruby 1.8.5 (2006-12-04 patchlevel 2) [i686-darwin8.8.1]
On 2/18/07, George Ogata <george.ogata@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi Detief, Aur,
On 2/19/07, SonOfLilit <sonoflilit@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 2/18/07, Detlef Reichl <detlef.reichl@gmx.org> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > what is the preferred way to see if an object already includes a
> > instance variable?
> >
> > for now i do something like:
> >
> > @my_object.instance_variables.include? "var_name"
> >
> Hi,
>
> AFAIK it's the only way.There's also:
obj.instance_eval{defined?(@foo)}
As you're hopefully aware, though, it's probably not particularly
straightforward because it's discouraged in general. Peeking at an
object's instance variables is kinda intruding on its privacy. There
are some valid uses to be sure, but usually I think you're better off
providing accessors for anything of interest outside the object.> Question: Why does Object#instance_varialbe_get have no documentation?
> It's behaviour isn't that clear in cases likeWhere are you looking? "ri instance_variable_get" gives me docs.
Regards,
George.
g@bang:~$ ri -T instance_variable_get
------------------------------------------- Object#instance_variable_get
obj.instance_variable_get(symbol) => obj
···
On 2/19/07, SonOfLilit <sonoflilit@gmail.com> wrote:
aur-sarafs-computer:~ aursaraf$ ri Object#instance_variable_get -T
------------------------------------------- Object#instance_variable_get
instance_variable_get(ivarname)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
(no description...)
aur-sarafs-computer:~ aursaraf$ ruby -v
ruby 1.8.5 (2006-12-04 patchlevel 2) [i686-darwin8.8.1]
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Returns the value of the given instance variable (or throws a
NameError exception). The @ part of the variable name should be
included for regular instance variables
class Fred
def initialize(p1, p2)
@a, @b = p1, p2
end
end
fred = Fred.new('cat', 99)
fred.instance_variable_get(:@a) #=> "cat"
fred.instance_variable_get("@b") #=> 99
g@bang:~$ ruby -v
ruby 1.8.5 (2006-12-25 patchlevel 12) [i686-linux]
Maybe a version thing? (Just guessing.)
Regards,
George.
FYI I get the same thing.
E:\Documents and Settings\Jason>ri instance_variable_get
------------------------------------------- Object#instance_variable_get
instance_variable_get(ivarname)
···
On 2/18/07, SonOfLilit <sonoflilit@gmail.com> wrote:
aur-sarafs-computer:~ aursaraf$ ri Object#instance_variable_get -T
------------------------------------------- Object#instance_variable_get
instance_variable_get(ivarname)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
(no description...)
aur-sarafs-computer:~ aursaraf$ ruby -v
ruby 1.8.5 (2006-12-04 patchlevel 2) [i686-darwin8.8.1]> As you're hopefully aware, though, it's probably not particularly
> straightforward because it's discouraged in general. Peeking at an
> object's instance variables is kinda intruding on its privacy. There
> are some valid uses to be sure, but usually I think you're better off
> providing accessors for anything of interest outside the object.
>
> > Question: Why does Object#instance_varialbe_get have no documentation?
> > It's behaviour isn't that clear in cases like
>
> Where are you looking? "ri instance_variable_get" gives me docs.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
(no description...)
E:\Documents and Settings\Jason>ruby -v
ruby 1.8.5 (2006-08-25) [i386-mswin32]
documentation here:
http://www.ruby-doc.org/core/classes/Object.src/M000323.html
Rdoc is there !!
ri instance_variable_get
------------------------------------------- Object#instance_variable_get
obj.instance_variable_get(symbol) => obj
···
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Returns the value of the given instance variable (or throws a
+NameError+ exception). The +@+ part of the variable name should be
included for regular instance variables
class Fred
def initialize(p1, p2)
@a, @b = p1, p2
end
end
fred = Fred.new('cat', 99)
fred.instance_variable_get(:@a) #=> "cat"
fred.instance_variable_get("@b") #=> 99
On 2/18/07, Jason Mayer <slamboy@gmail.com> wrote:
On 2/18/07, SonOfLilit <sonoflilit@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> aur-sarafs-computer:~ aursaraf$ ri Object#instance_variable_get -T
> ------------------------------------------- Object#instance_variable_get
> instance_variable_get(ivarname)
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> (no description...)
> aur-sarafs-computer:~ aursaraf$ ruby -v
> ruby 1.8.5 (2006-12-04 patchlevel 2) [i686-darwin8.8.1]
>
> > As you're hopefully aware, though, it's probably not particularly
> > straightforward because it's discouraged in general. Peeking at an
> > object's instance variables is kinda intruding on its privacy. There
> > are some valid uses to be sure, but usually I think you're better off
> > providing accessors for anything of interest outside the object.
> >
> > > Question: Why does Object#instance_varialbe_get have no
documentation?
> > > It's behaviour isn't that clear in cases like
> >
> > Where are you looking? "ri instance_variable_get" gives me docs.FYI I get the same thing.
E:\Documents and Settings\Jason>ri instance_variable_get
------------------------------------------- Object#instance_variable_get
instance_variable_get(ivarname)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
(no description...)E:\Documents and Settings\Jason>ruby -v
ruby 1.8.5 (2006-08-25) [i386-mswin32]documentation here:
http://www.ruby-doc.org/core/classes/Object.src/M000323.html
--
sur
http://expressica.com
FYI I get the same thing.
E:\Documents and Settings\Jason>ri instance_variable_get
------------------------------------------- Object#instance_variable_get
instance_variable_get(ivarname)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
(no description...)E:\Documents and Settings\Jason>ruby -v
ruby 1.8.5 (2006-08-25) [i386-mswin32]
same here:
<giles-computer:giles> [02-18 08:00] ~
! ri Object#instance_variable_get -T
------------------------------------------- Object#instance_variable_get
instance_variable_get(ivarname)
···
------------------------------------------------------------------------
(no description...)
<giles-computer:giles> [02-18 08:00] ~
! ruby -v
ruby 1.8.5 (2006-08-25) [i686-darwin8.8.3]
haven't had any trouble with ri on this machine before, that I remember.
--
Giles Bowkett
http://www.gilesgoatboy.org