IDE List

Hey Everyone,

I'm working through on the tutorial mentioned in my documentation proposal[1], and am trying to put together the installation part. One of the things I'd like to include is a list of IDEs that support Ruby natively (Redcar) or through a plugin (Netbeans). I've started a list here:

While it's only two programs at the moment, I'd like to get more in there. So basically I'm asking for some crowdsourcing help. The format for listing an IDE is shown at the top of the page. It uses GitHub's wiki system for collaborative editing, but feel free to send me an email if you don't feel like using the wiki, (not the list!) and I'll add your entry when I have the time.

Regards,
Chris White
Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/cwgem

[1]https://github.com/cwgem/koans-tutorial/

nano with syntax highlighting (a collection of highlighting files are
collected here: https://github.com/serialhex/nano-highlight\)
sublime test 2: Sublime Text 2 - Sublime Text <- my new default editor
hex

···

On Wed, Aug 3, 2011 at 12:21 PM, Chris White <cwprogram@live.com> wrote:

Hey Everyone,

I'm working through on the tutorial mentioned in my documentation
proposal[1], and am trying to put together the installation part. One of the
things I'd like to include is a list of IDEs that support Ruby natively
(Redcar) or through a plugin (Netbeans). I've started a list here:

Create new page · cwgem/koans-tutorial Wiki · GitHub

While it's only two programs at the moment, I'd like to get more in there.
So basically I'm asking for some crowdsourcing help. The format for listing
an IDE is shown at the top of the page. It uses GitHub's wiki system for
collaborative editing, but feel free to send me an email if you don't feel
like using the wiki, (not the list!) and I'll add your entry when I have the
time.

Regards,
Chris White
Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/cwgem

[1]GitHub - cwgem/koans-tutorial: A Ruby tutorial based on the Koans

--
my blog is cooler than yours: serialhex.github.com

The wise man said: "Never argue with an idiot. They bring you down to their
level and beat you with experience."

> Other than the fact Linux has a cool name, could someone explain why I
> should use Linux over BSD?

No. That's it. The cool name, that is. We worked very hard on
creating a name that would appeal to the majority of people, and it
certainly paid off: thousands of people are using linux just to be able
to say "OS/2? Hah. I've got Linux. What a cool name". 386BSD made the
mistake of putting a lot of numbers and weird abbreviations into the
name, and is scaring away a lot of people just because it sounds too
technical.

  -- Linus Torvalds' follow-up to a question about Linux

Hi,

I'm working through on the tutorial mentioned in my documentation proposal[1], and am trying to put together the installation part. One of the things I'd like to include is a list of IDEs that support Ruby natively (Redcar) or through a plugin (Netbeans). I've started a list here:

Create new page · cwgem/koans-tutorial Wiki · GitHub

You might be interested in the "the great ruby editor and ide roundup"
[1] which happened around two years ago.

It's a public Google Docs spreadsheet. I looked at it and it had like
three entries so I took the courtesy and reverted to the last revision
which a) Google Docs was able to show me (it had same errors showing
most of the recent revisions) b) showed the most IDEs AFAICS. Somehow
the doc could broken, it didn't looked as it was done maliciously.
Specifically I reverted to the revision from "Apr 7, 6:18 PM" and
disable the filter (it's confused if the filter is left active as it's
not very obvious that you're looking at filtered data).

HTH,
- Markus

[1] The great ruby editor and ide roundup - Ruby - Ruby-Forum

···

On 03.08.2011 18:21, Chris White wrote:

Thanks! Sounds like someone vandalised the page at some point :frowning: If
anyone knows a decent automated way to monitor that, please do let me
know.

martin

···

On Wed, Aug 3, 2011 at 10:18 AM, Markus Fischer <markus@fischer.name> wrote:

It's a public Google Docs spreadsheet. I looked at it and it had like
three entries so I took the courtesy and reverted to the last revision
which a) Google Docs was able to show me (it had same errors showing
most of the recent revisions) b) showed the most IDEs AFAICS. Somehow
the doc could broken, it didn't looked as it was done maliciously.
Specifically I reverted to the revision from "Apr 7, 6:18 PM" and
disable the filter (it's confused if the filter is left active as it's
not very obvious that you're looking at filtered data).

Hi,

···

On 06.08.2011 00:02, Martin DeMello wrote:

Thanks! Sounds like someone vandalised the page at some point :frowning: If
anyone knows a decent automated way to monitor that, please do let me
know.

Maybe editing for anonymous should just be disabled, it can happen so
fast by accident. But that may be against the spirit, but since we've a
pretty comprehensive list now ... hach, I don't know :slight_smile:

cheers