# Gems not found - what is the standard **URL:** \ **Category:** ruby-talk\ **Created:** [29 June 2006 21:25 UTC](https://rubytalk.org/t/gems-not-found-what-is-the-standard/28577 "2006-06-29T21:25:18Z")\ **Posts on this page:** 17\ **Page:** 1
**Author:** ![Lanny\_Rosicky](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/l/ecccb3/32.png) [@Lanny\_Rosicky](https://rubytalk.org/u/Lanny_Rosicky)\ **Post date:** [29 June 2006 21:25 UTC](https://rubytalk.org/t/gems-not-found-what-is-the-standard/28577/1 "2006-06-29T21:25:18Z")
I have Ruby installed on AIX. When running an application (typo in this case) I received no sch file to load message ... I found it was looking for redcloth. I found the gem in my gems library. After I ran ruby setup.rb in the RedCloth directory, I noticed it got installed/copied to my site directory. Rerunning the application now found the redcloth file but did find active\_suppot file. In the ACtive\_Support directory, I did not find any instruction what and where to copy. So I have two questions: Why does the gem install NOT install the files in a proper directory or what is the set up to have ruby application access the gems directories for require command PATH? LIBPATH? what ?? Thanks Lanny > **···** > > -- > Posted via [http://www.ruby-forum.com/](http://www.ruby-forum.com/). ---
**Author:** ![Austin\_Ziegler5](https://yyz1.discourse-cdn.com/flex029/user_avatar/rubytalk.org/austin_ziegler5/32/1985_2.png) [@Austin\_Ziegler5](https://rubytalk.org/u/Austin_Ziegler5)\ **Post date:** [29 June 2006 21:29 UTC](https://rubytalk.org/t/gems-not-found-what-is-the-standard/28577/2 "2006-06-29T21:29:06Z")
require 'rubygems' require 'RedCloth' RubyGems modifies the search path. -austin > **···** > > On 6/29/06, Lanny Rosicky \<[lanny@canczech.com](mailto:lanny@canczech.com)\> wrote: > > -- > Austin Ziegler \* [halostatue@gmail.com](mailto:halostatue@gmail.com) \* [http://www.halostatue.ca/](http://www.halostatue.ca/) >                \* [austin@halostatue.ca](mailto:austin@halostatue.ca) \* [http://www.halostatue.ca/feed/](http://www.halostatue.ca/feed/) >                \* [austin@zieglers.ca](mailto:austin@zieglers.ca) ---
**Author:** ![Lanny\_Rosicky](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/l/ecccb3/32.png) [@Lanny\_Rosicky](https://rubytalk.org/u/Lanny_Rosicky)\ **Post date:** [29 June 2006 21:43 UTC](https://rubytalk.org/t/gems-not-found-what-is-the-standard/28577/3 "2006-06-29T21:43:10Z")
Austin Ziegler wrote: > **···** > > > On 6/29/06, Lanny Rosicky \ wrote: > > > > require 'rubygems' > > require 'RedCloth' > > > > RubyGems modifies the search path. > > > > -austin > > I am sorry? Am I to prepend some file/all files/ with require 'rubygems' > > I need to set it up so that the applications executing the require > actually find the objects of the require statement > > -- > Posted via [http://www.ruby-forum.com/\](http://www.ruby-forum.com/%5C). ---
**Author:** ![Austin\_Ziegler5](https://yyz1.discourse-cdn.com/flex029/user_avatar/rubytalk.org/austin_ziegler5/32/1985_2.png) [@Austin\_Ziegler5](https://rubytalk.org/u/Austin_Ziegler5)\ **Post date:** [29 June 2006 21:46 UTC](https://rubytalk.org/t/gems-not-found-what-is-the-standard/28577/4 "2006-06-29T21:46:34Z")
This may be changed in Ruby 1.8.5, I think, but the answer essentially is yes. You can use RUBYOPTS=-rubygems but that's a bit of a hack. -austin > **···** > > On 6/29/06, Lanny Rosicky \ wrote: > > > Austin Ziegler wrote: > > \> On 6/29/06, Lanny Rosicky \ wrote: > > \> > > \> require 'rubygems' > > \> require 'RedCloth' > > \> > > \> RubyGems modifies the search path. > > \> > > \> -austin > > I am sorry? Am I to prepend some file/all files/ with require 'rubygems' > > > > I need to set it up so that the applications executing the require > > actually find the objects of the require statement > > -- > Austin Ziegler \* halostatue@gmail.com \* [http://www.halostatue.ca/](http://www.halostatue.ca/) >                \* austin@halostatue.ca \* [You are in a maze of twisty little passages, all alike. // halo • statue](http://www.halostatue.ca/feed/) >                \* austin@zieglers.ca ---
**Author:** ![Lanny\_Rosicky](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/l/ecccb3/32.png) [@Lanny\_Rosicky](https://rubytalk.org/u/Lanny_Rosicky)\ **Post date:** [29 June 2006 22:06 UTC](https://rubytalk.org/t/gems-not-found-what-is-the-standard/28577/5 "2006-06-29T22:06:29Z")
Austin Ziegler wrote: > > I need to set it up so that the applications executing the require > > actually find the objects of the require statement > > This may be changed in Ruby 1.8.5, I think, but the answer essentially > is yes. > > You can use RUBYOPTS=-rubygems but that's a bit of a hack. > > -austin Thanks. Setting RUBYOPTS would not be a hack if it worked. In my case ir would be /usr/local/lib/ruby/site\_ruby/but that is precicely where the GEMS do not get installed by gem install ... Thank you for your help. I am not about to grep through all files prepending a missing line of code, that is no fun :-). I'll wait for a while to see if this is fixed and play with Ruby on my Mac where it works perfectly - same version, same gems and same typi application. > **···** > > > On 6/29/06, Lanny Rosicky \ wrote: > > -- > Posted via [http://www.ruby-forum.com/\](http://www.ruby-forum.com/%5C). ---
**Author:** ![Christian\_Neukirche1](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/c/ee7513/32.png) [@Christian\_Neukirche1](https://rubytalk.org/u/Christian_Neukirche1)\ **Post date:** [1 July 2006 09:55 UTC](https://rubytalk.org/t/gems-not-found-what-is-the-standard/28577/6 "2006-07-01T09:55:04Z")
"Austin Ziegler" \ writes: > > Austin Ziegler wrote: > > \> > > \> require 'rubygems' > > \> require 'RedCloth' > > \> > > \> RubyGems modifies the search path. > > \> > > \> -austin > > I am sorry? Am I to prepend some file/all files/ with require 'rubygems' > > > > I need to set it up so that the applications executing the require > > actually find the objects of the require statement > > This may be changed in Ruby 1.8.5, I think, but the answer essentially is yes. > > You can use RUBYOPTS=-rubygems but that's a bit of a hack. Definitely no worse than breaking software for people that don't want to use Gems. require 'rubygems' is the thing I hate most about Rubygems: 1) As long as Rubygems is not standard, it adds a useless dependency    to the source. 2) If Rubygems becomes standard, it should not be needed anymore anyway. If you feel like having to use require 'rubygems', please catch the LoadError if it's not there. Thank you. > **···** > > > On 6/29/06, Lanny Rosicky \ wrote: > > > > > \> On 6/29/06, Lanny Rosicky \ wrote: > > > -austin > > -- > Christian Neukirchen \ [http://chneukirchen.org](http://chneukirchen.org) ---
**Author:** ![Jim\_Weirich1](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/j/73ab20/32.png) [@Jim\_Weirich1](https://rubytalk.org/u/Jim_Weirich1)\ **Post date:** [29 June 2006 22:38 UTC](https://rubytalk.org/t/gems-not-found-what-is-the-standard/28577/7 "2006-06-29T22:38:47Z")
Lanny Rosicky wrote: > Austin Ziegler wrote: > > > > I need to set it up so that the applications executing the require > > > actually find the objects of the require statement > > > > This may be changed in Ruby 1.8.5, I think, but the answer essentially > > is yes. > > > > You can use RUBYOPTS=-rubygems but that's a bit of a hack. > > > > -austin > > Thanks. Setting RUBYOPTS would not be a hack if it worked. Heh, Austin misstyped. Place the following in your .profile (or equivalent):    export RUBYOPT=rubygems See [http://docs.rubygems.org/read/chapter/3#page70](http://docs.rubygems.org/read/chapter/3#page70) for a discussion of the different options. > In my case ir > would be /usr/local/lib/ruby/site\_ruby/but that is precicely where the > GEMS do not get installed by gem install ... Umm ... you don't need to put the path name in RUBYOPT. Just "rubygems". That makes sure the RubyGems runtime is loaded and then it will find the rubygems for you. > **···** > > > > On 6/29/06, Lanny Rosicky \ wrote: > > -- > Posted via [http://www.ruby-forum.com/\](http://www.ruby-forum.com/%5C). ---
**Author:** ![Jacob\_Fugal](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/j/439d5e/32.png) [@Jacob\_Fugal](https://rubytalk.org/u/Jacob_Fugal)\ **Post date:** [29 June 2006 23:21 UTC](https://rubytalk.org/t/gems-not-found-what-is-the-standard/28577/8 "2006-06-29T23:21:37Z")
> Austin Ziegler wrote: > \>\> > \>\> I need to set it up so that the applications executing the require > \>\> actually find the objects of the require statement > \> > \> This may be changed in Ruby 1.8.5, I think, but the answer essentially > \> is yes. > \> > \> You can use RUBYOPTS=-rubygems but that's a bit of a hack. > > Thanks. Setting RUBYOPTS would not be a hack if it worked. In my case ir > would be /usr/local/lib/ruby/site\_ruby/but that is precicely where the > GEMS do not get installed by gem install ... What the RUBYOPT environment variable provides is a default set of flags to provide to the ruby runtime. So these are essentially equivalent:   RUBYOPT=-rubygems ruby foo.rb   ruby -rubygems foo.rb An added bonus to using RUBYOPT is that scripts marked as executable and with a shebang will receive the benefit as well. So if you're script starts with #!/usr/bin/ruby, then setting RUBYOPT=-rubygems before running the script is the same as changing the shebang to include the -rubygems flag. Now, the -rubygems flag itself isn't really it's own flag, it's a clever use of Ruby's -r flag. The -r flag requires its argument at the start of the script, as if you had added a require statement. So using the -rubygems flag (or placing -rubygems in your RUBYOPT) is equivalent to adding the following line to the top of every script:   require 'ubygems' The ubygems.rb file (in /usr/lib/ruby/site\_ruby/1.8/ on my system) in turn simply loads the actual 'rubygems' library. The 'ubygems' version is there just so you can type a -rubygems flag rather than -rrubygems. So... setting RUBYOPT=-rubygems is essentially equivalent to adding require 'rubygems' to each of your scripts, all through one environment variable. > Thank you for your help. I am not about to grep through all files > prepending a missing line of code, that is no fun :-). I'll wait for a > while to see if this is fixed and play with Ruby on my Mac where it > works perfectly - same version, same gems and same typi application. My guess is that it works on your Mac but not on your other machine because the Mac already has the RUBYOPT environment variable set up, while your other machine doesn't. You can check with:   echo $RUBYOPT on both machines at the command line. You can also try:   RUBYOPT=-rubygems script/server in your typo directory. Jacob Fugal > **···** > > On 6/29/06, Lanny Rosicky \ wrote: > > > \> On 6/29/06, Lanny Rosicky \ wrote: ---
**Author:** ![Austin\_Ziegler5](https://yyz1.discourse-cdn.com/flex029/user_avatar/rubytalk.org/austin_ziegler5/32/1985_2.png) [@Austin\_Ziegler5](https://rubytalk.org/u/Austin_Ziegler5)\ **Post date:** [30 June 2006 02:52 UTC](https://rubytalk.org/t/gems-not-found-what-is-the-standard/28577/9 "2006-06-30T02:52:42Z")
> Thanks. Setting RUBYOPTS would not be a hack if it worked. In my case ir > would be /usr/local/lib/ruby/site\_ruby/but that is precicely where the > GEMS do not get installed by gem install ... And they shouldn't be installed in site\_ruby. > Thank you for your help. I am not about to grep through all files > prepending a missing line of code, that is no fun :-). I'll wait for a > while to see if this is fixed and play with Ruby on my Mac where it > works perfectly - same version, same gems and same typi application. If the software that you're playing with is written right, you shouldn't need to prepend that missing line of code. -austin > **···** > > On 6/29/06, Lanny Rosicky \ wrote: > -- > Austin Ziegler \* halostatue@gmail.com \* [http://www.halostatue.ca/](http://www.halostatue.ca/) >                \* austin@halostatue.ca \* [You are in a maze of twisty little passages, all alike. // halo • statue](http://www.halostatue.ca/feed/) >                \* austin@zieglers.ca ---
**Author:** ![Jacob\_Fugal](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/j/439d5e/32.png) [@Jacob\_Fugal](https://rubytalk.org/u/Jacob_Fugal)\ **Post date:** [29 June 2006 23:31 UTC](https://rubytalk.org/t/gems-not-found-what-is-the-standard/28577/10 "2006-06-29T23:31:13Z")
Oh, and by the way, what version of Typo are you using? As far as I know, the current distribution of Typo comes with it's own copy of Rails 1.0 frozen in the vendor/ directory since Typo doesn't work (yet) with Rails 1.1. So it shouldn't even be looking for the rails gems. Also, looking in the default config/boot.rb for any Rails project, it looks like it's going to load rubygems explicitly for you unless you're using a copy of Rails in vendor/. I'm just curious about what your setup is like... Jacob Fugal ---
**Author:** ![Lanny\_Rosicky](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/l/ecccb3/32.png) [@Lanny\_Rosicky](https://rubytalk.org/u/Lanny_Rosicky)\ **Post date:** [30 June 2006 05:38 UTC](https://rubytalk.org/t/gems-not-found-what-is-the-standard/28577/11 "2006-06-30T05:38:35Z")
Austin Ziegler wrote: > **···** > > > On 6/29/06, Lanny Rosicky \ wrote: > > > > > Thanks. Setting RUBYOPTS would not be a hack if it worked. In my case ir > > > would be /usr/local/lib/ruby/site\_ruby/but that is precicely where the > > > GEMS do not get installed by gem install ... > > > > And they shouldn't be installed in site\_ruby. > > > > > Thank you for your help. I am not about to grep through all files > > > prepending a missing line of code, that is no fun :-). I'll wait for a > > > while to see if this is fixed and play with Ruby on my Mac where it > > > works perfectly - same version, same gems and same typi application. > > > > If the software that you're playing with is written right, you > > shouldn't need to prepend that missing line of code. > > > > -austin > > Thank you. Seems you are right, I tried another test project and it > worked well. Except for the coonect to Apache but I myst read some more > on it... > > -- > Posted via [http://www.ruby-forum.com/\](http://www.ruby-forum.com/%5C). ---
**Author:** ![Lanny\_Rosicky](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/l/ecccb3/32.png) [@Lanny\_Rosicky](https://rubytalk.org/u/Lanny_Rosicky)\ **Post date:** [30 June 2006 05:51 UTC](https://rubytalk.org/t/gems-not-found-what-is-the-standard/28577/12 "2006-06-30T05:51:09Z")
Jacob Fugal wrote: > Oh, and by the way, what version of Typo are you using? As far as I > know, the current distribution of Typo comes with it's own copy of > Rails 1.0 frozen in the vendor/ directory since Typo doesn't work > (yet) with Rails 1.1. So it shouldn't even be looking for the rails > gems. Also, looking in the default config/boot.rb for any Rails > project, it looks like it's going to load rubygems explicitly for you > unless you're using a copy of Rails in vendor/. I'm just curious about > what your setup is like... > > Jacob Fugal Thank you for responding. I will try to be brief ... I installed Ruby on 3 systems - OS/X from prepackaged installer - works well - Win XP binaries - works well - AIX 4.3.3 from tarball - took a while but finally it compiled and ran the basic rails test. I installed NOT using GNU compilers in standard locations as root. Typo has no boot.rb in config. It is version 2.6.0\_with\_rails. I think that by trying to get it going, I might have messed things up by moving stuff around. What do you think about me just cleaning up and doing it all over again - install clean and all... Lanny > **···** > > -- > Posted via [http://www.ruby-forum.com/\](http://www.ruby-forum.com/%5C). ---
**Author:** ![Lanny\_Rosicky](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/l/ecccb3/32.png) [@Lanny\_Rosicky](https://rubytalk.org/u/Lanny_Rosicky)\ **Post date:** [30 June 2006 07:02 UTC](https://rubytalk.org/t/gems-not-found-what-is-the-standard/28577/13 "2006-06-30T07:02:43Z")
Jacob Fugal wrote: \<....\> I did not wait for confirmation and reinstalled everything from scratch to be able to shouw you the original message: rs6000:/huge/typo-2.6.0\_with-rails\>script/server /usr/local/lib/ruby/site\_ruby/1.8/rubygems/custom\_require.rb:21:in `require\_\_': no such file to load -- redcloth (LoadError)         from /usr/local/lib/ruby/site\_ruby/1.8/rubygems/custom\_require.rb:21:in `require'         from ./script/../config/environment.rb:40         from script/server:42 rs6000:/huge/typo-2.6.0\_with-rails\> The standard test works ... rs6000:/u/rails/test\>script/server =\> Booting WEBrick... =\> Rails application started on [http://0.0.0.0:3000](http://0.0.0.0:3000) =\> Ctrl-C to shutdown server; call with --help for options [2006-06-30 02:50:10] INFO WEBrick 1.3.1 [2006-06-30 02:50:10] INFO ruby 1.8.4 (2005-12-24) [powerpc-aix4.3.3.0] [2006-06-30 02:50:10] INFO WEBrick::HTTPServer#start: pid=18794 port=3000 > **···** > > -- > Posted via [http://www.ruby-forum.com/](http://www.ruby-forum.com/). ---
**Author:** ![Jacob\_Fugal](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/j/439d5e/32.png) [@Jacob\_Fugal](https://rubytalk.org/u/Jacob_Fugal)\ **Post date:** [30 June 2006 15:44 UTC](https://rubytalk.org/t/gems-not-found-what-is-the-standard/28577/14 "2006-06-30T15:44:17Z")
Ok, it looks like rubygems is being required as necessary, since the error is originating in rubygems/custom\_require.rb. Have you installed the redcloth gem? (via 'gem install redcloth'... once it's installed as a gem, you shouldn't have to do anything else). Jacob Fugal > **···** > > On 6/30/06, Lanny Rosicky \ wrote: > > > rs6000:/huge/typo-2.6.0\_with-rails\>script/server > > /usr/local/lib/ruby/site\_ruby/1.8/rubygems/custom\_require.rb:21:in > > `require\_\_': no such file to load -- redcloth (LoadError) > >         from > > /usr/local/lib/ruby/site\_ruby/1.8/rubygems/custom\_require.rb:21:in > > `require' > >         from ./script/../config/environment.rb:40 > >         from script/server:42 ---
**Author:** ![Lanny\_Rosicky](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/l/ecccb3/32.png) [@Lanny\_Rosicky](https://rubytalk.org/u/Lanny_Rosicky)\ **Post date:** [30 June 2006 16:45 UTC](https://rubytalk.org/t/gems-not-found-what-is-the-standard/28577/15 "2006-06-30T16:45:21Z")
Jacob Fugal wrote: > > rs6000:/huge/typo-2.6.0\_with-rails\>script/server > > /usr/local/lib/ruby/site\_ruby/1.8/rubygems/custom\_require.rb:21:in > > `require\_\_': no such file to load -- redcloth (LoadError) > >         from > > /usr/local/lib/ruby/site\_ruby/1.8/rubygems/custom\_require.rb:21:in > > `require' > >         from ./script/../config/environment.rb:40 > >         from script/server:42 > > Ok, it looks like rubygems is being required as necessary, since the > error is originating in rubygems/custom\_require.rb. Have you installed > the redcloth gem? (via 'gem install redcloth'... once it's installed > as a gem, you shouldn't have to do anything else). > > Jacob Fugal You would think so, wouldn't you ... Here is the results after installing redcloth and rubypants rs6000:/huge/typo-2.6.0\_with-rails\>script/server /usr/local/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/actionpack-1.12.1/lib/action\_controller/components.rb:53:in `alias_method': undefined method `process\_cleanup' for class `ActionController::Base' (NameError)         from /usr/local/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/actionpack-1.12.1/lib/action\_controller/components.rb:53:in `included'         from /usr/local/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/actionpack-1.12.1/lib/action\_controller/components.rb:52:in `included'         from ./script/../config/..//vendor/rails/actionpack/lib/action\_controller.rb:73         from ./script/../config/..//vendor/rails/actionpack/lib/action\_controller.rb:61         from /usr/local/lib/ruby/site\_ruby/1.8/rubygems/custom\_require.rb:21:in `require'         from /usr/local/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/activesupport-1.3.1/lib/active\_support/dependencies.rb:147:in `require'         from ./script/../config/environment.rb:49         from script/server:42 rs6000:/huge/typo-2.6.0\_with-rails\> > **···** > > > On 6/30/06, Lanny Rosicky \ wrote: > > -- > Posted via [http://www.ruby-forum.com/\](http://www.ruby-forum.com/%5C). ---
**Author:** ![Jacob\_Fugal](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/j/439d5e/32.png) [@Jacob\_Fugal](https://rubytalk.org/u/Jacob_Fugal)\ **Post date:** [30 June 2006 19:35 UTC](https://rubytalk.org/t/gems-not-found-what-is-the-standard/28577/16 "2006-06-30T19:35:08Z")
(I've snipped some of the path off the backtrace lines for readability) > rs6000:/huge/typo-2.6.0\_with-rails\>script/server > .../gems/.../action\_controller/components.rb:53:in > `alias_method': undefined method `process\_cleanup' for class > `ActionController::Base' (NameError) >       from .../gems/.../action\_controller/components.rb:53:in `included' >       from .../gems/.../action\_controller/components.rb:52:in `included' >       from vendor/rails/.../action\_controller.rb:73 >       from vendor/rails/.../action\_controller.rb:61 >       from .../rubygems/custom\_require.rb:21:in `require' >       from .../gems/.../active\_support/dependencies.rb:147:in `require' >       from config/environment.rb:49 >       from script/server:42 Hmm. That's a really odd trace. Basically, since you're using the 2.6.0\_with-rails version of Typo, it should be using the version of Rails frozen in vendor/rails/ exclusively. But your trace jumps back and forth between the rails libs in the gem installed version of rails and the libs in vendor/rails/. Looks like a bug to me, not sure whether it's typo or rails, though. Or it might be something about your environment, but I'm not sure. Best approach would probably be to go ask on the typo and/or rails lists. Sorry 😕 Jacob Fugal > **···** > > On 6/30/06, Lanny Rosicky \ wrote: ---
**Author:** ![Lanny\_Rosicky](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/l/ecccb3/32.png) [@Lanny\_Rosicky](https://rubytalk.org/u/Lanny_Rosicky)\ **Post date:** [1 July 2006 00:50 UTC](https://rubytalk.org/t/gems-not-found-what-is-the-standard/28577/17 "2006-07-01T00:50:55Z")
Jacob Fugal wrote: > (I've snipped some of the path off the backtrace lines for readability) > > >       from config/environment.rb:49 > >       from script/server:42 > > Hmm. That's a really odd trace. Basically, since you're using the > 2.6.0\_with-rails version of Typo, it should be using the version of > Rails frozen in vendor/rails/ exclusively. But your trace jumps back > and forth between the rails libs in the gem installed version of rails > and the libs in vendor/rails/. Looks like a bug to me, not sure > whether it's typo or rails, though. Or it might be something about > your environment, but I'm not sure. Best approach would probably be to > go ask on the typo and/or rails lists. Sorry 😕 > > Jacob Fugal Jacob, you have been most helpfull and the problem is not a show stopper. I am just trying out RoR as a potential replacement of the current development environment which is Java-JSP-Tomcat. All the "new" stuff works and I am slowly learning my directions. Thanks again Lanny > **···** > > > On 6/30/06, Lanny Rosicky \ wrote: > > -- > Posted via [http://www.ruby-forum.com/\](http://www.ruby-forum.com/%5C).