All,
I notice that since a few days there seems to be a quite high number
of torn threads, i.e. threads which are not presented as a single
thread in GMail reader. It seems that messages in between are missing
which leads to a new thread. Interestingly GMail also does not
present the "Re:" at the beginning of the subject but I assume this is
a GMail feature. Does anybody have an idea what's going on?
Kind regards
robert
···
--
remember.guy do |as, often| as.you_can - without end
http://blog.rubybestpractices.com/
OK, I got one clue: these threads all landed partially in GMail spam.
Now I just need to find out what diverted them there. I think it may
be the "boxing" postings which I flagged as spam. Did anybody
experience the same?
Kind regards
robert
···
On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 12:09 PM, Robert Klemme <shortcutter@googlemail.com> wrote:
I notice that since a few days there seems to be a quite high number
of torn threads, i.e. threads which are not presented as a single
thread in GMail reader. It seems that messages in between are missing
which leads to a new thread. Interestingly GMail also does not
present the "Re:" at the beginning of the subject but I assume this is
a GMail feature. Does anybody have an idea what's going on?
--
remember.guy do |as, often| as.you_can - without end
http://blog.rubybestpractices.com/
I am not in a position to comment on GMail issues, but I can tell you
that I am not seeing any such problems in Mutt. Even if I manually
delete emails from the middle of a thread, the thread remains connected.
I think the issue is related to GMail's handling of threading itself.
···
On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 07:14:20PM +0900, Robert Klemme wrote:
On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 12:09 PM, Robert Klemme > <shortcutter@googlemail.com> wrote:
> I notice that since a few days there seems to be a quite high number
> of torn threads, i.e. threads which are not presented as a single
> thread in GMail reader. It seems that messages in between are missing
> which leads to a new thread. Interestingly GMail also does not
> present the "Re:" at the beginning of the subject but I assume this is
> a GMail feature. Does anybody have an idea what's going on?
OK, I got one clue: these threads all landed partially in GMail spam.
Now I just need to find out what diverted them there. I think it may
be the "boxing" postings which I flagged as spam. Did anybody
experience the same?
--
Chad Perrin [ original content licensed OWL: http://owl.apotheon.org ]
I guess you are right. My main error was not to look into Spam before
posting. But ruby-talk messages landed in Spam so rarely in the past
that I did not even think of that option. 
Kind regards
robert
···
On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 10:01 PM, Chad Perrin <code@apotheon.net> wrote:
On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 07:14:20PM +0900, Robert Klemme wrote:
On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 12:09 PM, Robert Klemme >> <shortcutter@googlemail.com> wrote:
> I notice that since a few days there seems to be a quite high number
> of torn threads, i.e. threads which are not presented as a single
> thread in GMail reader. It seems that messages in between are missing
> which leads to a new thread. Interestingly GMail also does not
> present the "Re:" at the beginning of the subject but I assume this is
> a GMail feature. Does anybody have an idea what's going on?
OK, I got one clue: these threads all landed partially in GMail spam.
Now I just need to find out what diverted them there. I think it may
be the "boxing" postings which I flagged as spam. Did anybody
experience the same?
I am not in a position to comment on GMail issues, but I can tell you
that I am not seeing any such problems in Mutt. Even if I manually
delete emails from the middle of a thread, the thread remains connected.
I think the issue is related to GMail's handling of threading itself.
--
remember.guy do |as, often| as.you_can - without end
http://blog.rubybestpractices.com/