Hi,
···
"trans. (T. Onoma)" <transami@runbox.com> wrote:
On Saturday 13 November 2004 01:00 am, Aredridel wrote:
On Tue, 9 Nov 2004 12:53:11 +0900, Zev Blut <rubyzbibd@ubit.com> wrote:
> On Tue, 9 Nov 2004 04:13:08 +0900, Aredridel <aredridel@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Give XTemplate a spin -- with a little work to emulate hashes in your
> > objects, you can use arbitrary objects as data, as in Amrita, and it
> > works nicely and fast
>
> XTemplate seems pretty close to Amrita, but I really do not want to
> have to make my objects emulate hashes. If I have to put that much
> work into preparing my output, then I might as well stick the data I
> want into hashes in the first place... Although, thanks for reminding
> me of XTemplate! When I get the time I will try to look into it a bit
> more. How much faster is it than Amrita?A fair bit, since it can use an XML parser. Not an order of magnitude,
but noticeably. Depends on what you do, of course.I've often heard Amrita is great but slow. I wonder if anyone is up to
translating the slow bits to c ?T.
Actually, the author did it. The author of Amrita released an
experimental version which implements some of its functions in C. I
guess it was version 1.8.2 something but the development of it seems a
bit stalled since then.
Takashi Sano