[...] (technical elaborations).
Which means that it's effectively impossible to alter the behaviour,
without altering the source-code.
Thanks for the information.
.
···
On 2 Ιούν, 14:29, Peter Zotov <whitequ...@whitequark.org> wrote:
On Thu, 2 Jun 2011 20:05:34 +0900, Ilias Lazaridis wrote:
> On 2 Ιούν, 10:02, Peter Zotov <whitequ...@whitequark.org> wrote:
>> On Thu, 2 Jun 2011 13:25:25 +0900, Ilias Lazaridis wrote:>> > On 1 Ιούν, 16:22, Robert Klemme <shortcut...@googlemail.com> > >> wrote:
>> >> It can be as easy as
>> > [...]>> > You suggested implementation adds a new function.
>> > At least, if you suggest an implementation, do it in the OO way
>> > (overloading the relevant method).>> There is no separate method in Ruby which does the variable
>> substitution.
>> This functionality is hardcoded into lexer and parser.> I understand.
> This means it is not easy, if not impossible to alter the behaviour.
> Can I change this functionality with a C-level extension, but without
> altering the ruby source?Definitely no (for MRI, at least).