Even though I agress that using the same name for both the local
parameter and a method with the same name might be a bad idea, my code
still works without any problem. If I redefine self using to:
There's working code, and there's clear code. The goal: working code
that is clear!
Hmmm...why can you merge() but not directly assign to
individual keys when a hash is frozen?
Duh. Because merge() produces a new hash--it doesn't change the frozen
hash.
···
On 14 Apr, 03:09, 7stud -- <bbxx789_0...@yahoo.com> wrote: