7rans
(7rans)
1 October 2010 13:39
1
I recently upgraded from 1.8.7-p72 to 1.8.7-p249 and a piece of code
that I had long relied on stopped working. Here is an example of the
issue:
class X
def q; "q"; end
end
class Y < X
def q
f do
super()
end
end
def f(&b)
b.call
end
end
y = Y.new
y.q
NoMethodError: super called outside of method
from (irb):7
from (irb):11:in `call'
from (irb):11:in `f'
from (irb):6:in `q'
from (irb):15
I tried this on 1.9.2 and it works so I am assuming this is a bug with
p249?
Hello,
(2010/10/01 22:39), Intransition wrote:
NoMethodError: super called outside of method
from (irb):7
from (irb):11:in `call'
from (irb):11:in `f'
from (irb):6:in `q'
from (irb):15
I tried this on 1.9.2 and it works so I am assuming this is a bug with
p249?
Yes and fixed already. Try a newer patchlevel.
Would you mind reporting this as a bug on
Bugs : ruby1.8 package : Ubuntu ?
I'll try to take it from there.
- Lucas
···
On 01/10/10 at 22:39 +0900, Intransition wrote:
I recently upgraded from 1.8.7-p72 to 1.8.7-p249 and a piece of code
that I had long relied on stopped working. Here is an example of the
issue:
class X
def q; "q"; end
end
class Y < X
def q
f do
super()
end
end
def f(&b)
b.call
end
end
y = Y.new
y.q
NoMethodError: super called outside of method
from (irb):7
from (irb):11:in `call'
from (irb):11:in `f'
from (irb):6:in `q'
from (irb):15
I tried this on 1.9.2 and it works so I am assuming this is a bug with
p249?
7rans
(7rans)
1 October 2010 18:09
4
Thanks. I was hoping the Debian/Ubuntu package maintainer would get
wind of it by posting it to ruby-talk.
Interestingly I was looking for someone to contact and came across
this blog post.
Ruby packaging in Debian and Ubuntu: Mythbusting and FAQ – Lucas Nussbaum's Blog
···
On Oct 1, 11:06 am, Urabe Shyouhei <shyou...@ruby-lang.org> wrote:
Hello,
(2010/10/01 22:39), Intransition wrote:
> NoMethodError: super called outside of method
> from (irb):7
> from (irb):11:in `call'
> from (irb):11:in `f'
> from (irb):6:in `q'
> from (irb):15
> I tried this on 1.9.2 and it works so I am assuming this is a bug with
> p249?
Yes and fixed already. Try a newer patchlevel.