2009/1/11 Luis Lavena <luislav...@gmail.com>:
> On Jan 10, 4:21 pm, Michal Suchanek <hramr...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On 10/01/2009, Luis Lavena <luislav...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > On Jan 10, 2:47 pm, Heesob Park <pha...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > > Hi,
>> > > 2009/1/10 Luis Lavena <luislav...@gmail.com>:
>> > > > On Jan 10, 8:15 am, Heesob Park <pha...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > > >> 2009/1/10 Roger Pack <r...@doachristianturndaily.info>:>> Anyone knows any web application for bounties? I'm interested in
>> > > >> >> contribute to this one and also one for Readline!!!
>> > > >> > Yeah I'm in for Readline 
>> > > >> > Note that highline has a getc for windows, and cmd is also readline
>> > > >> > like, so I believe it is possible 
>> > > >> > -=r
>> > > >> > As a note I get the same error message Luis does.
>> > > >> I guess you are looking for ruby_readline [1] .
>> > > > Hello Park,
>> > > > Actually I'm looking to an API-compatible replacement, which should
>> > > > work with IRB and auto complete capabilities.
>> > > > Not only that, but a solution that can work across platforms,
>> > > > including Windows 
>> > > > There is a solution called RawLine [1] but is not API-compliant with
>> > > > ReadLine.
>> > > > Thank you again for your pointer.
>> > > > [1]http://rubyforge.org/projects/rawline/
>> > > I found the pure Perl implementation of the readline libraries called
>> > > libterm-readline-perl-perl [1]
>> > > I hope some one could port it into Ruby.
>> > > If no one port it until the end of this month, I will port it.
>> > Well, I don't have the time, but I can give some contribution for it,
>> > so 
>> > > BTW, I succeeded "gem build" as well as "gem install" with my zlib.rb
>> > > and rbzlib.rb.
>> > > You should test it with the latest zlib.rb and rbzlib.rb at [2]
>> > I've run the specs of Zlib for your code:
>> > Finished in 0.328 seconds
>> > 38 examples, 25 failures
>> I guess it's expected. Different implementations give different
>> compression results.
> The failures are related to wrong number of arguments.
> if a replacement for Zlib is developed, it must comply with Zlib specs
> located in rubyspec:
>http://github.com/rubyspec/rubyspec/tree/b83d7e5f40659f551c7e94667ffe\.\.\.
> It should implement the exact same compression strategies. If not, is
> not a "drop-in" replacement.
>> Of course, the spec might be more high-level but then an
>> implementation that does not compress at all would likely work as
>> well.
> The spec is being used across IronRuby, Rubinius, JRuby and the Ruby C
> (MRI). So the pure-ruby replacement must comply.
At last, my zlib.rb and rbzlib.rb passed rubyspec zlib test
As before, you can download athttp://121.78.227.9/rbzlib/
Finished in 1.323951 seconds
77 files, 38 examples, 88 expectations, 0 failures, 0 errors