BENCHMARKING RUBY 2.4 TO 3.0 Article - Why so disappointing?

ruby-talk
1

I read this article minutes ago:

I've imagined that Ruby 3 wouldn't be so fast like 3x of ruby 2 in every
scenario. But slower than 2.4? Even worse, with JIT?

Why? I'm so confused...

···

--
Fellipe Fingoli

2

Didn't 2.6 implement a lot of the upcoming 3.0 improvements ? Maybe they're
having trouble integrating the successful 2.6 implementations with new
features in 3.0 ?

···

On Fri, Jan 8, 2021 at 9:12 AM Fellipe Fingoli <fellipe.fingoli@gmail.com> wrote:

I read this article minutes ago:
Benchmarking Ruby 2.4 to 3.0 - gettalong's web home

I've imagined that Ruby 3 wouldn't be so fast like 3x of ruby 2 in every
scenario. But slower than 2.4? Even worse, with JIT?

Why? I'm so confused...

--
Fellipe Fingoli

Unsubscribe: <mailto:ruby-talk-request@ruby-lang.org?subject=unsubscribe>
<http://lists.ruby-lang.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/ruby-talk&gt;

--
A musician must make music, an artist must paint, a poet must write, if he
is to be ultimately at peace with himself.
- Abraham Maslow