Hi all,
I came across this article from Jack Herrington on E4X with Ruby:
http://www.onlamp.com/pub/a/onlamp/2004/08/12/ruby_e4x.html?page=1
I know E4X has been mentioned here in the past a couple times, but
it's been a while. It seemed pretty neat to me. Any thoughts?
Enjoy!
Dan
Daniel Berger wrote:
I know E4X has been mentioned here in the past a couple times, but
it's been a while. It seemed pretty neat to me. Any thoughts?
I like it, seems ideal for reading and writing configuration files in XML, or 'per file' XML records.
Erik.
Daniel Berger ha scritto:
Hi all,
I came across this article from Jack Herrington on E4X with Ruby:
http://www.onlamp.com/pub/a/onlamp/2004/08/12/ruby_e4x.html?page=1
I know E4X has been mentioned here in the past a couple times, but
it's been a while. It seemed pretty neat to me. Any thoughts?
I love the way rexml can be twisted. I wrote a SimpleXML-like interface (the new php library for parsing xml) in near to 30 lines, just like it was did with E4X.
HAL_9000
(HAL 9000)
13 September 2004 07:45
4
Erik Terpstra wrote:
Daniel Berger wrote:
I know E4X has been mentioned here in the past a couple times, but
it's been a while. It seemed pretty neat to me. Any thoughts?
I like it, seems ideal for reading and writing configuration files in XML, or 'per file' XML records.
I like it, too... but I'm wondering about conflicts between XML names
and existing Ruby methods. Or am I misunderstanding how it works?
Hal
Hal Fulton wrote:
I like it, too... but I'm wondering about conflicts between XML names
and existing Ruby methods. Or am I misunderstanding how it works?
I am not sure either, I haven't read the article yet, but I already knew about E4X.
Anyway, wouldn't the same problem occur with yaml?
Erik.