Answering my own question: it's a standard library, not core.
It'd be nice if the site could offer the core page's list/filter
feature for (core+stdlib). The people most in need of documentation
are least likely to know which stuff to lookup on the core section of
the site vs stdlib section. "Not found" will translate to "ruby
doesn't have that" or "go find a gem" in many a newcomer's mind.
···
On Wed, Oct 5, 2011 at 4:38 PM, Carina C. Zona <cczona@gmail.com> wrote:
Hmm. Why isn't Etc listed among the Class/Module selector? It's part
of core for 1.9.x, right?On Wed, Oct 5, 2011 at 2:38 PM, James Britt <james.britt@gmail.com> wrote:
Carina C. Zona wrote:
The new styling is a nice. And no more frames, definite upgrade!
You'd might be surprised that some people miss them. (I don't.)
Adding class/method search was a much-needed feature. Thank you.
Issues on the RDoc Documentation page:1) Methods filter is failing on searches for any of the methods equal
to or starting with "<" or ">".Ah.
I'll have to see what's up with that.
2) Although the method filter is snappy on the first search, it then
needs 30-90 seconds to do anything else, even update from a single
character backspace or permit the browser to do page reload. (On my
Chrome/OSX, anyway. Anyone else seeing experiencing this?). The
class/module filter does not share this issue.Work is being done on this. It is slow, especially on Chrome.
Thanks for the feedback.
James
--
Carina
--
Carina