[ANN] Ruby 1.9.2 is released

ruby-talk
21

Spencer Roach wrote:

···

On 8/20/10 12:00 AM, "Caio Chassot" <dev@caiochassot.com> wrote:

what was wrong. I guess you don't even need to `make install` again,
just nuke the unwanted gem installation in site_ruby.

Again, the paths:

* /usr/local/lib/ruby/1.9.1/rubygems # <== good
* /usr/local/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.9.1/rubygems # <== bad

Fair warning: This may only apply to my system. Think twice before you
go `rm -rf`-happy on yours. :stuck_out_tongue:

Thanks for this! That was the solution I needed...works like a charm
now!

Worked great for me too -- thx.
--
Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/\.

22

I did a brief writeup on some of these issues, here:
http://www.prestonlee.com/2010/09/24/upgrading-from-ruby-1-9-1-to-ruby-1-9-2/

···

--
Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.

23

Hi Preston,

I did a brief writeup on some of these issues, here:
Upgrading From Ruby 1.9.1 to Ruby 1.9.2 – Preston Lee's Blog

Incredible, your post was right on time for me! I struggled to get
ruby-opengl compiled with 1.9.2 because of the "`bin_path’: can’t find
executable rake" issue which for the hell I couldn't figure out what's
wrong.

I'm using rvm so deleting
~/.rvm/rubies/ruby-1.9.2-p0/lib/ruby/gems/1.9.1/specifications/rake.gemspec
fixed this for me -> many thanks!

Same issue with 1.9.2-head too (not surprisingly) so
~/.rvm/rubies/ruby-1.9.2-head/lib/ruby/gems/1.9.1/specifications/rake.gemspec
went to Kansans too.

- Markus

···

On 25.09.2010 00:10, Preston Lee wrote: