ANN: RJudy-0.1 - Judy Arrays for Ruby

ruby-talk
1

It works great. I find that insertion time is faster using judy,
retrieval time is about the same.

Yes, this sounds consistent with what I was seeing. Judy arrays had slightly
faster lookup times but not substantial.

I also find that memory usage is lower with judy.

That's good to hear (I hadn't looked at memory use at all yet).

Thanks for helping me test this stuff, and let me know if you have
suggestions about where this should go next :wink:

···

On Tue, 27 Aug 2002 10:52:28 -0700, Joseph McDonald <joe@vpop.net> wrote :

2

lyle@knology.net wrote:

It works great. I find that insertion time is faster using judy,
retrieval time is about the same.

Yes, this sounds consistent with what I was seeing. Judy arrays had slightly
faster lookup times but not substantial.

If an app needs many array lookups, every small improvement is
good.

···

On Tue, 27 Aug 2002 10:52:28 -0700, Joseph McDonald joe@vpop.net wrote :

–
Giuseppe “Oblomov” Bilotta

Axiom I of the Giuseppe Bilotta
theory of IT:
Anything is better than MS