They're cumulative.
Yours,
Tom
···
On Sat, 2005-04-09 at 23:45 +0900, James Britt wrote:
(Out of curiosity, are the download numbers restricted to each current
version, or cumulative for all versions over time? )
They're cumulative.
Yours,
Tom
On Sat, 2005-04-09 at 23:45 +0900, James Britt wrote:
(Out of curiosity, are the download numbers restricted to each current
version, or cumulative for all versions over time? )
Austin Ziegler wrote:
I'm not sure that it does, really.
To some extent, it does. From the mail that I get as a maintainer, it is clear that there is at least three-digits number of people, including many non-programmers, who use it regularly as a tool.
I think that application has yet to be written.
I can't think of any programming language launched into mainstream by one single application. We need applications, plural.
--
Best regards,
Alexey Verkhovsky
Ruby Forum: http://ruby-forum.org (moderator)
RForum: http://rforum.andreas-s.net (co-author)
Instiki: http://instiki.org (maintainer)
But you can see the download numbers for each release on the project's
release page, i.e., here:
http://rubyforge.org/frs/?group_id=186
Yours,
Tom
On Sat, 2005-04-09 at 12:28 -0400, Tom Copeland wrote:
On Sat, 2005-04-09 at 23:45 +0900, James Britt wrote:
> (Out of curiosity, are the download numbers restricted to each current
> version, or cumulative for all versions over time? )They're cumulative.