Ara.T.Howard schrieb:
Basically, we need core language support for versioning.
agreed.
Which is, as far as I understood, more or less what Tom proposed. A quote from the original post:
I believe it would be better if Ruby itself simply elaborated on its
#require method (and #load method of course) to handle versioned
directory tiers.
Thank you both, Austin and Ara, for the additional infos and the code samples.
Regards,
Pit
On Sun, 20 Nov 2005, Austin Ziegler wrote:
Bil Kleb wrote:
Nikolai Weibull wrote:
> Nor does IMHO for basically the same reason.
For whatever reason, I don't view IMHO as inflammatory as STFU, YMMV.
Yeah, I was just being a bit silly (and you seem to have picked up on
that ;-).
> Seriously, when is an opinion humble?
Sometimes, I think "honest" instead of "humble", sorry for the
confusion.
No problem, but I guess that's a good reason for not using
abbreviations. Anyway, I'll take an honest opinion over a humble one
any day.
--
Bil
Born in Aurora, IL; currently residing in Yorktown, VA
;-D
nikolai
--
Nikolai Weibull: now available free of charge at http://bitwi.se/\!
Born in Chicago, IL USA; currently residing in Gothenburg, Sweden.
main(){printf(&linux["\021%six\012\0"],(linux)["have"]+"fun"-97);}
Except that Trans has taken an irrational dislike to the way that
RubyGems does this and has proposed something that is even *less*
usable and is conceptually bankrupt. Frankly, I tire of the
nonsensical whimsical proposals that have no application in the real
world. I want him to put up this time, because every other critic of
RubyGems so far has failed to do so in any way that solves the twin
problems.
I still maintain that packaging and versioning belong together.
-austin
On 11/20/05, Pit Capitain <pit@capitain.de> wrote:
Ara.T.Howard schrieb:
> On Sun, 20 Nov 2005, Austin Ziegler wrote:
>> Basically, we need core language support for versioning.
> agreed.
Which is, as far as I understood, more or less what Tom proposed. A
quote from the original post:> I believe it would be better if Ruby itself simply elaborated on its
> #require method (and #load method of course) to handle versioned
> directory tiers.
Thank you both, Austin and Ara, for the additional infos and the code
samples.
--
Austin Ziegler * halostatue@gmail.com
* Alternate: austin@halostatue.ca
