Yep. My bad.
Since Ruby already has two version of this, a new
third version, would be the tertiary operator. 
Gary Wright
···
On May 11, 2005, at 7:41 PM, Mark Hubbart wrote:
First of all, it's the ternary operator
Yep. My bad.
Since Ruby already has two version of this, a new
third version, would be the tertiary operator.
Gary Wright
On May 11, 2005, at 7:41 PM, Mark Hubbart wrote:
First of all, it's the ternary operator