Alternative Ruby grammar

Maybe they've improved it since last time I looked at it... It couldn't parse much of anything the first (couple?) time it was announced.

···

On Nov 16, 2007, at 10:13 , Nick Sieger wrote:

Depending on what you view as "complete", there is the XRuby ANTLR-based parser:

Ryan Davis wrote:

Depending on what you view as "complete", there is the XRuby ANTLR-based parser:

Maybe they've improved it since last time I looked at it... It couldn't parse much of anything the first (couple?) time it was announced.

As I've heard it they're able to compile the full stdlib, so I presume that means they can parse it.

However, when I occasionally play with XRuby, I frequently find something not quite right. Last time, they were missing flip-flop.

- Charlie

···

On Nov 16, 2007, at 10:13 , Nick Sieger wrote:

To be fair... flip-flop isn't quit right.

···

On Nov 17, 2007, at 17:17 , Charles Oliver Nutter wrote:

However, when I occasionally play with XRuby, I frequently find something not quite right. Last time, they were missing flip-flop.