I know this is a thorn to bring up every so often.
But I have yet to find either an AIX package for 5.x
or instructions on how to build 1.8.2 with sockets that actually work.
I did get one build once, but it failed with errors trying to use SOAP.
I know this is a thorn to bring up every so often.
But I have yet to find either an AIX package for 5.x
or instructions on how to build 1.8.2 with sockets that actually work.
I did get one build once, but it failed with errors trying to use SOAP.
I know this is a thorn to bring up every so often.
But I have yet to find either an AIX package for 5.x
or instructions on how to build 1.8.2 with sockets that actually work.
I did get one build once, but it failed with errors trying to use SOAP.
If you have already tried with these patches, post the error messages.
I've not tested real applications. My test script is extremely simple.
It may cause no problem even though that patches couldn't fix all
problems.
My test script:
require 'net/http'
Net::HTTP.start('www.example.com', 80) { |http|
response = http.get('/index.html')
puts response.body
}
On 8/19/05, bww00amdahl@yahoo.com <bww00amdahl@yahoo.com> wrote:
I need an AIX build also.
Thanks
Bryan Webb
ober wrote:
> I know this is a thorn to bring up every so often.
> But I have yet to find either an AIX package for 5.x
> or instructions on how to build 1.8.2 with sockets that actually work.
> I did get one build once, but it failed with errors trying to use SOAP.
>
> Has anyone any new info on the AIX port?
>
> Thanks in Advance
>
> Ober
I tried those patches with xlc to no luck.
Wouldn't those patches also have made it into the latest stable cvs?
···
On Sun, 21 Aug 2005, KUBO Takehiro wrote:
ober <ober@linbsd.org> writes:
I know this is a thorn to bring up every so often.
But I have yet to find either an AIX package for 5.x
or instructions on how to build 1.8.2 with sockets that actually work.
I did get one build once, but it failed with errors trying to use SOAP.
If you have already tried with these patches, post the error messages.
I've not tested real applications. My test script is extremely simple.
It may cause no problem even though that patches couldn't fix all
problems.
My test script:
require 'net/http'
Net::HTTP.start('www.example.com', 80) { |http|
response = http.get('/index.html')
puts response.body
}
/usr/local/bin/ruby182/bin # ruby testrb
testrb:2:in `require': No such file to load -- test/unit (LoadError)
from testrb:2
Any script with the "require" stmt fails.
Regards,
Victor
···
On 8/27/05, ober <ober@linbsd.org> wrote:
That appears to work.
Thanks!
On Tue, 23 Aug 2005, KUBO Takehiro wrote:
> ober <ober@linbsd.org> writes:
>
>> Well I am trying to get it to compile on 5.1.
>> I will try this process for compiling.
>> No, this version wont work on 5.1.
>
> ruby 1.8.2 on AIX 5.1 with IPv4 socket was also built, which was
> configured with '--disable-ipv6' and '--prefix=/usr/local/ruby182'
>
> binary:
> http://www.jiubao.org/tmp/ruby182-aix51.tar.gz (AIX 5.1)
> http://www.jiubao.org/tmp/ruby182-aix52.tar.gz (AIX 5.2)
>
> root user:
> cd /usr/local
> gzip -dc ruby182-aix51.tar.gz | tar xvf -
> ..or..
> gzip -dc ruby182-aix52.tar.gz | tar xvf -
>
> users:
> PATH=$PATH:/usr/local/ruby182/bin
> export PATH
>
> They are tested by the following simple script.
>
> require 'net/http'
> Net::HTTP.start('www.example.com', 80) { |http|
> response = http.get('/index.html')
> puts response.body
> }
>
> --
> KUBO Takehiro
> email: kubo@jiubao.org
> web: http://www.jiubao.org
> GnuPG fingerprint = 5F7B C8EF CA16 57D0 FDE1 9F47 C001 1F93 AC08 2262
>
You can do it with OpenSSL (openssl.rb). It's part of the standard library.
Mohit.
···
On 8/27/05, Diego Barros <diego@heyboyo.com> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I was wondering if it was possible to connect to a POP3 server using
> SSL? I am using Ruby 1.8.2 (on OS X).
>
> Any help would be appreciated. Thanks.
>
> Regards,
> Diego
>
>
--
Mohit Muthanna [mohit (at) muthanna (uhuh) com]
"There are 10 types of people. Those who understand binary, and those
who don't."
--
Mohit Muthanna [mohit (at) muthanna (uhuh) com]
"There are 10 types of people. Those who understand binary, and those
who don't."
Thank you so much for your help. I will run a set of tests tomorrow morning.
Victor
···
On 8/29/05, KUBO Takehiro <kubo@jiubao.org> wrote:
Victor Reyes <victor.reyes@gmail.com> writes:
> I guess I am not as lucky as other members.
> I downloaded the binary for AIX 5.2 and have some problems.
>
> ruby -v returns;
> /usr/local/bin/ruby182/bin # ruby -v
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Did you untar the tar-ball at /usr/local/bin?
Untar at /usr/local instead.
cd /usr/local
gzip -dc ruby182-aix52.tar.gz | tar xvf -
Well, I got it to work on two AIX 5.3 Servers.
What I need now is a 182 build that works under 4.3.3 (Yes, I know 4.3.3 is
not supported by IBM anymore).
Thank you
···
On 8/29/05, Victor Reyes <victor.reyes@gmail.com> wrote:
My mistake!
I now untar it now at /usr/local and executed the example given below, and
it worked.
Thank you so much for your help. I will run a set of tests tomorrow
morning.
Victor
On 8/29/05, KUBO Takehiro <kubo@jiubao.org> wrote:
>
> Victor Reyes <victor.reyes@gmail.com> writes:
>
> > I guess I am not as lucky as other members.
> > I downloaded the binary for AIX 5.2 and have some problems.
> >
> > ruby -v returns;
> > /usr/local/bin/ruby182/bin # ruby -v
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>
> Did you untar the tar-ball at /usr/local/bin?
> Untar at /usr/local instead.
>
> cd /usr/local
> gzip -dc ruby182-aix52.tar.gz | tar xvf -
>
> --
> KUBO Takehiro
> email: kubo@jiubao.org
> web: http://www.jiubao.org
> GnuPG fingerprint = 5F7B C8EF CA16 57D0 FDE1 9F47 C001 1F93 AC08 2262
>
>
Well, I got it to work on two AIX 5.3 Servers.
What I need now is a 182 build that works under 4.3.3 (Yes, I know 4.3.3 is
not supported by IBM anymore).
Thank you for the info. I'll give it a try tonight.
Victor
···
On 8/31/05, KUBO Takehiro <kubo@jiubao.org> wrote:
Victor Reyes <victor.reyes@gmail.com> writes:
> Well, I got it to work on two AIX 5.3 Servers.
> What I need now is a 182 build that works under 4.3.3 (Yes, I know 4.3.3is
> not supported by IBM anymore).